Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
It claimed that slavery was legal in every state of the Union, if the Constitution was interpreted in a certain way. This delighted the South, as much as it angered Northern Abolitionists, and raised the temperature of the whole slavery debate nationwide.
Texan independence, achieved in 1836, heightened tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions in the United States. The annexation of Texas in 1845 as a slave state exacerbated these tensions, as it expanded the territory where slavery was permitted. This conflict over the extension of slavery into new territories contributed to the larger sectional divisions that ultimately led to the Civil War. Additionally, the desire to expand slavery into new states fueled the debate over states' rights and federal authority, further polarizing the nation.
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
The Missouri Compromise temporarily settled the debate over slavery by allowing Missouri enter the Union as a slave state. Maine was allowed to enter the Union as a free state.
a domestic debate about imperialism
Cuba.
Stephen A. Douglas
William Wilberforce
Slavery
For the most part, the national debate on slavery was not whether to abolish it. Most Americans, especially in the North, did not want slavery to spread to the western frontiers.
In 1844, the us presidential election featured a debate on westward expansion. John K. Polk won presidency. He was a slaveholder, and firmly favored annexation of Texas "at the earliest practicable."
It was also a debate about the issue of slavery.
The main constitutional arguements during the debate over slavery were representation in Congress, importation of slaves, and the Bill of Rights.
Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
Both had a strong position in the Anti Slavery debate. They both were against slavery and agreed that there should be no more slave states.
Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas were the two participants in the great debate over slavery prior to the election of 1858.