First off, they system of checks and balances means that each of the 3 branches (Judicial, executive and legislative) check up on each other to ensure due process is being followed. Now to answer your question as to how it works, take a look at how a bill is made into a law.
The bill is drafted in one of the houses of congress (Senate or House of representatives) which is considered the legislative branch. Then it goes up for vote in either a committee or sub committee of that particular house of congress and if it passes that stage, it goes for a full vote from the particular house that drafted the bill.
Now, if the bill passes one house of congress, it goes to the other for a vote. If the bill still hasn't been shot down, it goes to the president (Federal Laws) or Governor (State laws) who are both the heads of the executive branch. The president/Governor can...
A) Veto the bill in which case the bill would be sent back to the draftee(s) and possibly edited and then to the full congress for a new vote. If 2/3 of the congress still votes on the bill to become law, it becomes law.
B) Do nothing in which case the bill becomes law.
or
C) Sign the bill into law which makes the bill a law obviously.
Now, if someone has a problem with the law, they can take it up in court which is the judicial system. The courts have the power to strike down the laws. Of course, both sides have the right to appeal if they are unhappy with the decision or think that it is wrong. For example, just recently the health care law went to the Supreme Court of the United States. The court could have said the whole law is garbage and that would have stopped the law.
Just in case you don't see the check and balances system playing out, I will explain it. The system prevents one person, group or branch from having too much power. If you have a democratic congress and a republican president (or vice versa), a lot of bills sent to the president from the congress will most likely be shot down. With the checks and balances system, even if a president vetoes a bill, the congress still can overrule the president thus keeping the executive and legislative branches in check. When the bill is a law, the courts can find that a law is unconstitutional or violates another law, and get rid of it. However, there is even a system of checks and balances in the judicial system otherwise known as the appeals system.
I know this answer was very long and detailed, but I really wanted to make sure you got a full response to your question. I hope this helps!
The system of checks and balances affects the branches of government by ensuring that each of the 3 branches of government are equal in power.
The system of checks and balances, both checks, and limits the power of the 3 branches of government to ensure that each branch of government doesn't become to powerful.
There is no question that it can slow things down, and the founders probably had that in mind. When you are trying to maintain a representative government, it is important to protect the rights of those who hold minority opinions. One way to do that is to work it so that no individual, and no group has all the power. This makes sense, and it's important. If we had an emperor or dictator, things would get done more quickly, but I would not want to be on the nasty end of one of her decisions, without being able to voice opposition.
First off, they system of checks and balances means that each of the 3 branches (Judicial, executive and legislative) check up on each other to ensure due process is being followed. Now to answer your question as to how it works, take a look at how a bill is made into a law.
The bill is drafted in one of the houses of congress (Senate or House of representatives) which is considered the legislative branch. Then it goes up for vote in either a committee or sub committee of that particular house of congress and if it passes that stage, it goes for a full vote from the particular house that drafted the bill.
Now, if the bill passes one house of congress, it goes to the other for a vote. If the bill still hasn't been shot down, it goes to the president (Federal Laws) or Governor (State laws) who are both the heads of the executive branch. The president/Governor can...
A) Veto the bill in which case the bill would be sent back to the draftee(s) and possibly edited and then to the full congress for a new vote. If 2/3 of the congress still votes on the bill to become law, it becomes law.
B) Do nothing in which case the bill becomes law.
or
C) Sign the bill into law which makes the bill a law obviously.
Now, if someone has a problem with the law, they can take it up in court which is the judicial system. The courts have the power to strike down the laws. Of course, both sides have the right to appeal if they are unhappy with the decision or think that it is wrong. For example, just recently the health care law went to the Supreme Court of the United States. The court could have said the whole law is garbage and that would have stopped the law.
Just in case you don't see the check and balances system playing out, I will explain it. The system prevents one person, group or branch from having too much power. If you have a democratic congress and a republican president (or vice versa), a lot of bills sent to the president from the congress will most likely be shot down. With the checks and balances system, even if a president vetoes a bill, the congress still can overrule the president thus keeping the executive and legislative branches in check. When the bill is a law, the courts can find that a law is unconstitutional or violates another law, and get rid of it. However, there is even a system of checks and balances in the judicial system otherwise known as the appeals system.
I know this answer was very long and detailed, but I really wanted to make sure you got a full response to your question. I hope this helps!
The bureaucracy is an extension of the executive branch which is difficult to control since they are not appointed directly by the people, therefore the ways to check the power on bureaucracy are to consult an administrative law judge if any regulation set in place is unlawful. Each bureaucratic sector is also required to report their findings, research, or productiveness to congress to evaluate whether the benefit outweighs the cost for maintaining a particular department.
The Founding Fathers added a system of checks and balances to the principle of separation of powers written into the Constitution.
The checks and balances system ensures a fair government, so that one Branch does not become to powerful.
How do the three branches work within the system of check and balances?
By the Government controlling it.
they have a system of checks and protect agaist
The system of checks and balances affects the branches of government by ensuring that each of the 3 branches of government are equal in power. The system of checks and balances, both checks, and limits the power of the 3 branches of government to ensure that each branch of government doesn't become to powerful.
checks and balancesIt is a system of checks and balances.
The US government has a system of checks and balances.
The system of checks and balances.
The Checks and Balances system maintains the separation of powers.
Balances
This system is called the Checks and Balance System
Checks and balances IS the system of our government. No one branch is more powerful than another to prevent a king.
Checks and Balances
Checks and Balances
wqhat stops one branch of government from having too much power?
In the U.S. a system of checks and balances