answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Two amendments in the Bill of Rights imply a right to privacy. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from "unreasonable search and seizure". But in recent years, the Tenth Amendment is often cited as the basis of a right to privacy. The Tenth Amendments states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Some scholars and Constitutional experts believe that if there is no constitutional provision allowing an invasion of privacy by the government, then the people can claim power over their own privacy or the "right to be let alone." This belief has formed the basis in arguments in favor of the right to abortion, same-sex marriage and medical marijuana laws, among others.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

The "Right to Privacy" is an implied right, not one that is explicitly stated in the Constitution and its amendments (like the Right to Free Speech is in Amendment I).

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How right to privacy is implied by other constitutional rights guaranteed in the Constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

What are the five zones of privacy created by the Constitution?

The Constitution protects the privacy of beliefs, home and a person's possessions. The Constitution states that rights should not deny anyone of life liberty or property without due process.


What does it mean to say that the right to privacy falls within the prenumbra of a specific constitutional protection?

The US Constitution listed a set of un-enumerated rights that were thought to be so basic that they did not need to be listed as other rights were. These rights are often called penumbra's which means Obscure, but in law means implied. For instance, many claim "Free Speech" based on the First Amendment; while the First Amendment gives no right of "Free Speech" - the right of free speech to any individual is implied.


How many times is the word privacy mentioned in the constitution including articles and amendments?

(1) Only once does it even say private. (The fifth amendment)(2) The Ninth Amendment reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."


What is the constitutional basis for the right to privacy?

It is controversial whether or not there is a constitutional right to privacy. Those who believe that there is no right to privacy reason that the right to privacy is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Those who believe that there is a right to privacy believe that a right to privacy is implied by the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and 14thAmendments.One of the strongest arguments for the right to privacy is the events following America's independence. When the founding fathers discussed introducing the Bill of Rights, many were in opposition. The opposition reasoned that listing specific rights in the Constitution might imply that rights not listed therein are not rights of American citizens. Those favoring the Bill of Rights reasoned that if no rights are listed specifically, then no rights are protected. The Ninth Amendment was introduced to quell the fears of those against a Bill of Rights.The Ninth Amendment of the US Constitution states, " The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." This Amendment is used as an argument for the existence of a right to privacy. Those believing that a right to privacy does not exist often reason thus because the right is not enumerated. Those believing there is a right to privacy state the Ninth Amendment; a right not listed cannot be used to imply that it does not exist.Another right that strongly implies a right to privacy is the Fourth Amendment. It states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The only reason that a citizen of the United States would be opposed to unreasonable search and seizure is violation of privacy or because they are hiding evidence of a crime. This Amendment is reason for many to believe that the founding fathers had the right to privacy in mind while writing the Amendments.The Fourteenth Amendment, in the last portion of the First Article states, "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." Some might interpret the deprivation of privacy by the state as a violation of one's liberty. Further, prior to the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights applied to the federal government of the United States alone. This Amendment bars state governments from violating the rights the federal government was barred from violating (i.e. Constitutional rights.)The First and Third Amendments may also imply privacy. The first Amendment might be taken to imply a right to privacy of one's beliefs. The Third Amendment might be taken to imply a right to privacy within one's home from troops. Prior to the third Amendment, it was often customary for troops to quarter in the private residences of citizens. The third Amendment might be taken as evidence that the founding fathers had intended to imply rights to privacy.Various non-Constitutional privacy laws have however been enacted, at both Federal and State levels. Examples of these include HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996) which addresses medical patient privacy, the Privacy Act of 1974 (functionally a reinforcement and update to the IV amendment), and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (financial privacy) among others.Other areas where privacy laws have recently bloomed, predominantly at the State level, relate to medical issues beyond what is covered in HIPAA, including the special privacy requirements of AIDS/HIV patients and victims of criminal abuse.AnswerWhile it's true the right to privacy isn't mentioned in the Constitution, the US Supreme Court decided privacy is an implied 1st, 3rd, 4th, 9th, and the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause.The judicial concept is called "Substantive Due Process," which holds that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause is intended to protect all unenumerated rights considered fundamental and "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty," among these the right to privacy. Use of Substantive Due Process is considered judicial activism, in that it seeks to limit the scope of laws that undermine personal liberty, even if the law doesn't address a right specifically mentioned in the Constitution.Earlier, Lochner-era (approximately 1897-1937, second industrial revolution) Courts used Substantive Due Process in a way that reduced protection of the individual against exploitation by businesses and the government, such as protecting the right of the individual to negotiate contracts with an employer by holding employment laws regulating minimum wage and work conditions unconstitutional.Today, Substantive Due Process is used to protect the individual against exploitation or legislation that creates an undue burden on individuals, or on an identifiable group or class of citizens.In order to determine whether the government has valid cause to interfere in people's lives, the Court applies a "rational basis test" to determine whether the legislation is related to a legitimate government interest. If the law passes the rational basis test, the Court next applies "strict scrutiny" to determine whether there is a compelling state interest that justifies violating the groups' or individuals' fundamental rights, and whether the law is applied as narrowly as possible to infringe those rights as little possible.


In Katz v. US the Supreme Court ruled on whether police could tap a public phone without a warrant. Identify the test that resulted from this case.?

It helped establish a right that is implied rather than directly stated in the Bill of Rights. -Apex

Related questions

Why must you have a search warrant?

to protect privacy rights that are guaranteed in the constitution


Although there is no mention of privacy in the Constitution courts have recognized a constitutional right of privacy in the areas of sex reproductions and family life?

True


What makes something a right when dealing with constitution and rights?

ANYTHING issued as a right or is IMPLIED as a right within the Bill of Rights. An IMPLIED right is privacy, NO WHERE in the Constitution is privacy listed as a right; however, the U.S. S.C. had implied privacy as a right such as the 4th amendment when pertaining to search and seizures and also as recognized by the U.S.S.C. in Roe v Wade in the abortion issue (privacy) and also in Griswold v. Connecticut (marital contraception issues) and many more. Just because you do NOT view the word RIGHT in the area of the constitution you are viewing, DOES NOT mean you have no right. The U.S. Supreme Court has made NUMEROUS rulings giving citizens rights that were never listed or implied in the Constitution.


Is the constitutional right to privacy specific or implied?

While the right to privacy isn't specifically mentioned in the Constitution, the US Supreme Court decided privacy is an implied right under the 14th Amendment Due Process Clause.The judicial concept is called "Substantive Due Process," which holds that the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause is intended to protect all unenumerated rights considered fundamental and "implicit in the concept of ordered liberty," among these the right to privacy. Use of Substantive Due Process is considered judicial activism, in that it seeks to limit the scope of laws that undermine personal liberty, even if the law doesn't address a right specifically mentioned in the Constitution.


Where does it say you have a right to privacy?

The US Constitution doesn't explicitly mention the right to privacy, but it is implied by the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. For a more in-depth discussion of the right to privacy, see Related Questions, below.


How many times is the word privacy mentioned in the Constitution the articles and amendments?

the word "privacy" is not actually mentioned in the Constitution


Which amendment protects your privacy?

No Constitutional Amendment explicitly enumerates the right to privacy. The right to privacy is implied under the 1st, 4th, 9th, and 14th Amendments. The U.S. Supreme Court first acknowledged a right to privacy in the case Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, which affirmed the right to marital privacy. The most common argument today deals with Justice Harlan's "substantive due process" justification, which arises from the 14th Amendment due process clause and the 9th Amendment.


What is the right to protect privacy called?

There is no right to privacy- it is assumed from something else in the constitution.


What is' reading in' in relation to the interpretation of statutes?

When you "read in" something, you are finding an implied meaning in the text and assuming that was what the writer intended. For example, there is no specific "right to privacy" in the Constitution, but later interpretations found that meaning implied by Article IV, which refers to people being "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures..."


Is a right to privacy guaramteed by the constitution?

The fourth ammendment


How many times does the constitution say privacy?

Zero


What are the five zones of privacy created by the Constitution?

The Constitution protects the privacy of beliefs, home and a person's possessions. The Constitution states that rights should not deny anyone of life liberty or property without due process.