The government would have become a tyranny if there was no separation of powers
Government is not what the federalists feared to be the most apparent source of tyranny. The federalists supported the idea of government. They actually believed that the most apparent source of tyranny was the Majority Rule - that is to say they thought that the popular majority would be able to unite and "trample on the rules of justice". It was the anti-federalists who believed that government was naturally tyrannical.
All government types have the ability to become "cruel" or "unjust" commonly the term used is "Tyranny" but there have also been many other terms.
In reaction to the tyranny of Hippias.
To protect against tyranny
tyranny
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Tyranny, that's the word you're looking for!The word that best describes a cruel and unjust government is a Tyranny.
Usually a tyrannical government has a dictator.
Tyranny
Cruel is the rule . :)
Monarchy, Authoritarian Government, Dictatorship, or Tyranny.
They take votes
olympia
Monarchy No - it's a coup d'etat. a+ the answer is tyranny
The quote "When the government fears the people, there is liberty; when the people fear the government, there is tyranny" is attributed to Thomas Jefferson. This statement reflects the idea that a healthy democracy relies on the government being accountable to the citizens, while tyranny arises when the government instills fear in its populace. Jefferson's views emphasize the importance of individual rights and the role of the people in holding their government accountable.
Tyranny,Aristocracy,Monarchy etc.