Probably not as all history is written from somebody'sview point.
Everyone has a bias. Some are just more open about it.
A layer in an archaeological dig is called an archaeological context. This is usually referred to as a sequence or archaeological record.
archaeological source is about history. Literary source is about book
Crystal River Archaeological State Park was created in 1971.
Those dinosaur bones were unearthed during a recent archaeological dig.
There was such little recorded history and archaeological findings.
Everyone has a bias. Some are just more open about it.
Even though there are no historical written records of such and no archaeological findings ...I still think yes!
The oldest known Aboriginal Australian is believed to be around 65,000 years old, based on archaeological findings.
Only if you make it unbiased. Samples can be weird. If you make it unbiased, then yes.
They were first bred by the Toltec civilization around 100 AD. The first archaeological findings of such breed were found around 1850 in the Mexican state of Chihuahua, from which the breed took its name.
between 1962 and 1970 some years back,archaeological findings which include fragments of the skull of one of the earliest human beings in the Philippines were discovered in Tabon Cave in Palawan.
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution suggest that, yes, we are indeed descended from common ancestors of the apes. Later archaeological and DNA findings support his theory of evolution. However Christians or other religious people believe otherwise.
The newspaper was unbiased because it presented both sides of the story.
Neutral and nonpartisan are synonyms for unbiased.
The Archaeological Journal was created in 1844.
Significant findings means meaningful findings worth mentioning.