The decline
Bad emperors
Inflation with economy
Mercenarie army
Too big
The western part of the Roman Empire fell under the weight of the invasions by the Germanic peoples who took over its lands. The eastern part of the Roman Empire was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years. Historians have coined the term Byzantine Empire to indicate the eastern part of the Roman Empire after the fall of the western part.
The conventional date for the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire is given as 476, the year when the last emperor in the west, Romulus Augustus, was deposed.
The term decline and fall of the empire is used because the empire begun to decline centuries before the actual fall of the western part of the empire. There was a decline in the economy of the empire with a big reduction in the volume of trade and the collapse of the urban economy. There was also a decline in the ability of the empire to defend itself from attacks from outside.
The fall of the Western Roman Empire (the western part of the empire) was quite quick and occurred as a result of the Germanic invasions. These Germanic peoples took over most of the lands of the west. The eastern Roman Empire (the eastern part of the empire) was not affected by these invasions and continued to exist for another 1,000 years.
Economic troubles. Nobody wanted to fight for Rome. bad emperors. Im suprised it lasted as long as it did.
the vandals brought the downfall of rome ain't that awesome
German tribes immigrated to Rome under pressure from the Huns. Rome agreed to allow their immigration and to participate in the Roman economy if they came unarmed. This was an unrealistic requirement as most of the immigrants where displaced forcibly and feared for their lives. Eventually their open boarders policy became their downfall. They did not invade, they were invited by Rome.
As all countries (nations) do sooner or later, they deteriorated from the inside, same as Rome did. Nations consist of people, and people do not live forever neither.
demeters downfall was her daugter pereshpohne was taken and demeter was shearchig so demters crops were faling
It depends on wat u mean by downfall cuz he had many thngs that slowd him down and got in his way
Pizzaro
Belief in Philosopha doctrine and dialectics, lead to the downfall of Rome
Barbarians.
Cleopatra's downfall was her ambition and greed. She wanted to rule Rome, as she affirmed every time she said "as sure as I shall give judgment on the Capitol in Rome".
The final downfall of Greece was in 88 BC due to rebellion against Rome with King Mithridates of Pontus. After the revolt failed, Rome decimated what was left of Greece.
The downfall of Rome
Lead poisoning was part of the reason for the fall of Rome, but there were many other factors also, as is the case in any downfall.
Goths, Vandals, Franks, Bulgars, Huns.
It caused Europe to divide in to many states battling for power and land.
Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.Although Odoacer was the leader who deposed the last Roman emperor of the west in 476, he can not actually be given the total credit or blame for it. The downfall of Rome was a culmination of several conditions and several key people were involved in Rome's fall. Odoacer just happened to be the one who engineered the final takeover.
There was a downfall. It was King Peter's downfall. The downfall of the city. The market experienced a downfall.
German tribes immigrated to Rome under pressure from the Huns. Rome agreed to allow their immigration and to participate in the Roman economy if they came unarmed. This was an unrealistic requirement as most of the immigrants where displaced forcibly and feared for their lives. Eventually their open boarders policy became their downfall. They did not invade, they were invited by Rome.
There's little evidence that enforcing conscription weakened rome. It seems to be quite the opposite. When enforced conscription was no longer needed they moved to a professional army, and later to barbarians and mercenaries. Rome's downfall had a lot more do to with political and economic hardships