How did the Constitution the confederacy differ from that of the US?

Answer 1

The Confederate constitution was almost a duplicate of the US model with a few exceptions. These were:

* Slavery was legal;

* Secession from the Confederacy was forbidden; and

* The term of the Confederate president was a single six year term, with no possibility of reelection.

What can be noted was that at the time, the US Supreme Court had given slavery a de facto legality.

And, the six year presidential term allowed for total focus on the affairs of the office as there was no "reelection" campaign.

The six year term was a good idea, according to a number of historians and political scientists.

Answer 2

The Confederate constitution was almost a duplicate of the US model with a few exceptions. These were:

* Slavery was legal;

* Secession from the Confederacy was forbidden; and

* The term of the Confederate president was a single six year term, with no possibility of reelection.

What can be noted was that at the time, the US Supreme Court had given slavery a de facto legality.

And, the six year presidential term allowed for total focus on the affairs of the office as there was no "reelection" campaign.

The six year term was a good idea, according to a number of historians and political scientists.

Answer 3

"Overall, the CSA constitution does not radically alter the federal system that was set up under the United States constitution. It is thus very debatable as to whether the CSA was a significantly more pro-"states' rights" country (as supporters claim) in any meaningful sense. At least three states rights are explicitly taken away- the freedom of states to grant voting rights to non-citizens, the freedom of states to outlaw slavery within their borders, and the freedom of states to trade freely with each other.

States only gain four minor rights under the Confederate system- the power to enter into treaties with other states to regulate waterways, the power to tax foreign and domestic ships that use their waterways, the power to impeach federally-appointed state officials, and the power to distribute "bills of credit." When people champion the cause of reclaiming state power from the feds, are matters like these at the tops of their lists of priorities?

As previously noted, the CSA constitution does not modify many of the most controversial (from a states' rights perspective) clauses of the American constitution, including the "Supremacy" clause (6-1-3), the "Commerce" clause (1-8-3) and the "Necessary and Proper" clause (1-8-18). Nor does the CSA take away the federal government's right to suspend habeus corpus or "suppress insurrections."

As far as slave-owning rights go, however, the document is much more effective. Indeed, CSA constitution seems to barely stop short of making owning slaves mandatory. Four different clauses entrench the legality of slavery in a number of different ways, and together they virtually guarantee that any sort of future anti-slave law or policy will be unconstitutional. People can claim the Civil War was "not about slavery" until the cows come home, but the fact remains that anyone who fought for the Confederacy was fighting for a country in which a universal right to own slaves was one of the most entrenched laws of the land.

In the end, however, many of the most interesting changes introduced in the CSA constitution have nothing to do with federalism or slavery at all. The President's term limit and line-item veto, along with the various fiscal restraints, and the ability of cabinet members to answer questions on the floor of Congress are all innovative, neutral ideals whose merits may still be worth pondering today."

Answer 4

The Confederate Constitution was primarily a copy of the United States Constitution with some key changes, primarily involving the permanent legalization of slavery and restricting the power of Congress to act in the general welfare. There were, for instance, three branches of government, including a Supreme Court and bicameral Congress

Answer 5

The Confederate Constitution contained a number of small changes to the US Constitution. The major difference, however, was that it endorsed slavery and racial inequality. It also specifically outlawed secession.