answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

He wasn't a bad king but he just didnt last very long as king

User Avatar

Raven Altenwerth

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Harold Godwinson was as good as any other king in the 11th century. He was a powerful and rich landowner and popular with most of the richer people in England.

Land, money, power and the ability to keep other people on your side make a good king because they bring stability and peace to the population.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

He wasn't a bad king but he just didnt last very long as king

This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Halima Awan

Lvl 1
3y ago
That is true

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

yes he was a bad leader because he has no leadership experience and does not care about his army.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Harold Godwinson was the last Angelo-Saxton King to rule England. His rule was very short lasting from January 6th until his death at The Battle of Hastings later that year.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Harold was not a great military leader. He was fooled by William the Conqueror's false retreat.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

yes because he was very powerful and loved by many people of his country

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Halima Awan

Lvl 4
3y ago

King Harold was not a bad king he just was or a king for very long😰😢

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

he did not win the battle of Hastings!

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is Harold godwinson a good king?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions