0
What else can I help you with?
What arguments do the federalist paper 51 make?
Federalist Paper No. 51, written by James Madison, argues for the necessity of checks and balances within the government to prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful. It emphasizes the importance of a separation of powers among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches to protect individual liberties. Madison also discusses the role of human nature in governance, suggesting that the ambition of one branch should counteract the ambition of another, thereby ensuring the government remains accountable to the people. Overall, the paper advocates for a strong, yet balanced and restrained government structure.
Which amendment restrained congressional salaries?
The 27th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States became the rule that restrained congressional salaries. Oddly, this was proposed by James Madison in 1789, but it was not finalized until 1992.
In 1890 the US passed the Sherman antitrust act.what was the purpose of this act?
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 was designed to combat monopolistic practices and promote fair competition in the marketplace. Its primary purpose was to prohibit business activities that restrained trade or commerce, such as monopolies, cartels, and trusts. By doing so, the Act aimed to protect consumers and ensure that no single entity could dominate a market to the detriment of others. The legislation marked a significant step in the U.S. government's efforts to regulate big business and maintain economic fairness.
How did John Marshall help establish the authority of the Supreme Court?
Many of the Marshall Court's decisions strengthened not only the Supreme Court, but the new Federal government. Chief Justice Marshall believed in shared power between the US and the states, but believed the intent of the Constitution was to organize the power around a strong central government.In McCulloch v. Maryland, (1819), the Court prevented the State of Maryland from imposing an unfair tax on the federal Second National Bank, advancing the doctrine of implied powers, invoking the Article I Necessary and Proper Clause, and asserting the Article VI Supremacy Clause, elevating the authority of federal law over state law.The Marshall Court also discouraged states from defying the federal government's authority by holding the Eleventh Amendment was no bar to the federal courts exercising appellate jurisdiction over state court decisions involving federal question jurisdiction; subordinated common law rule (laws based on court decisions) to statutory law; advanced the "complete diversity" principle that made it difficult for corporate shareholders to sue each other in federal courts; restrained the States from violating the terms of charters, and upheld Congress's right to regulate laws affecting interstate business under the Interstate Commerce Clause (Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824)), etc.Overall, the Marshall Court strengthened both the judiciary and the federal government by resolving issues of state sovereignty, Constitutional supremacy, legal jurisdiction, and separation of powers. In doing so, John Marshall successfully established the Judicial branch's power as a co-equal branch of government, and the Supreme Court as final arbiter of the US Constitution.
What is an absolute monarcy?
Absolute monarchy is a ruler who is NOT restrained by laws, a constitution, custom or elections. He/she controls both the lives of the government and his/her subjects. The monarch may appoint the "prime minister" but that position is just a figurehead and it serves as a adviser to the monarch. Also, the monarch can dismiss/dissolve his/her parliament on his/her free will without the advise of the prime minister. Another thing, the monarch may dismiss all of his/her cabinets/advisers/council-members and even the prime minister.
What was the English Government in the 17th century a. a mixed government in which the power of the king was restrained b. an absolute monarchy c. a republic d. a democracy?
d
What is the legal notion that the power of government is limited and restrained by legal means and is not at the mercy of whims of individuals?
The legal notion that the power of government is limited and restrained by legal means is known as the "rule of law." This principle asserts that all individuals and institutions, including the government, are accountable to the law, which is fairly applied and enforced. It ensures that government actions are conducted within a framework of established laws, protecting citizens from arbitrary decision-making and abuse of power.
How were sick people restrained by the magistrates?
Sick people could be restrained by magistrates through quarantine measures, isolation in designated facilities, or by issuing stay-at-home orders. In some cases, individuals who were considered a risk to public health could be physically restrained or detained under government authority.
What does a liberal democracy do?
A liberal democracy is a government in which people vote for politicians and those politicians are restrained by rights given to the people and by the rule of law.
What sentence can you write with free enterprise?
Another word for free enterprise is free market and it means a business govorned by the laws of supply and demand and it is restrained by the government.
What is a form of government in which the power to rule is significantly restrained by a strong Constitution or other document.?
A form of government where the power to rule is significantly constrained by a strong Constitution is known as a constitutional government. In this system, the Constitution serves as the supreme law, outlining the rights of citizens and limiting the authority of the government. This framework ensures that government actions are subject to legal checks and balances, promoting accountability and protecting individual liberties. Examples include constitutional monarchies and republics.
How many types of government have there been?
there have been many types of government. but i guess the top are democracy-by the people for the people direct democracy-direct decisions made by the people monarchy-supreme power or sovereignty held by a single person. absolute monarchy-a monarchy that is not limited or restrained by laws or a constitution. limited monarchy-a monarchy that is limited by laws and a constitution. dictatorship-a country, government, or the form of government in which absolute power is exercised by a dictator. federalism-the federal principle of government. totalitarian-someone has total control
What does it means to say the United States has a federal system of government?
That the US has several functions of government, one that is federal and the other that is state and local. The US federal system creates a central government that is restrained two ways. Clearly as per the Framers, all powers not relegated to the federal government are left to the states. In addition to that, the Framers created a central government where power is separated. The executive, legislative and judicial branches are designed to not allow any branch to have too much power by itself. The separation of powers is an excellent method of controlling an uneven growth of power in any single branch.
How did the political right think about expanding government?
The political right typically views government expansion with skepticism, often arguing that it can lead to inefficiency, increased taxation, and encroachment on individual liberties. They advocate for limited government intervention, emphasizing personal responsibility and free-market principles. When expansion is considered, it is usually framed within the context of enhancing national security or economic growth, rather than broad social programs. Overall, the right tends to favor a restrained approach to government power and intervention.
What branch of government was intended to be more powerful than any other?
The design of three branches of government, the executive, legislative, and judicial, is for no branch to be dominant. If each branch can be restrained by the other two branches, than no single branch will exercise tyrannical power. That is the point. A dominant branch is exactly what this system is intended to prevent.
What qualification do you think the president should consider in the appointment of a federal judge?
I believe the President should most consider whether or not the federal judicial appointee believes in keeping government power restrained within the framework of the U.S. Constitution.
Which party believed that the federal government used too much force in putting down the Whiskey Rebellion?
The Democratic-Republican Party, led by figures like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, believed that the federal government used excessive force in suppressing the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794. They argued that the response was an overreach of federal authority and represented a threat to individual liberties and states' rights. This perspective highlighted their concerns about centralized power and the need for a more restrained federal government.
