-- Multiparty systems tend to encourage regional voting, so a
two-party system will tend to have some support from throughout a
country or other electoral unit.
-- Two-party systems tend to be quite stable and predictable (although
obviously not as stable as a one-party system, which has obvious
disadvantages).
-- With two parties, the candidate who wins almost always has a
majority of the votes or close to it. In some other systems, a
candidate can be elected even though supported by a small minority.
-- Both parties in a two-party system tend to see broad support and
thus tend to become politically moderate and better able to rule. In
the USA, for example, both major parties have solid bases they can
count on, so they seek support from the center.
As far as I am concerned- I am tired of voting for a person i have 6/10 things in common with instead of the person I have the other 4/10 things in common with. I reluctantly give my vote to a person who I don't feel happy and excited about. Giving more options to the American people would allow them to pick a person with ideals that truly fit who they are- and it might stop some of these politicians from lying so much about their views in order to sway us independent voters.
The main advantage of having a two-party system versus a more fragmented one is the simplicity of forming and maintaining a government.
As such, in a 'pure' two party system (such as the one present in the US) you never need coalitions, the winning party being able to form a government immediately and rule on its own.
In a more fragmented system (such as the ones typically produced by proportional representation voting systems), after each and every election you have a period of bargaining and discussions in order to create a coalition (a group of parties) to have the majority and, together, form a government.
This period can be relatively orderly managed and short in more homogeneous societies with mature party systems (such as the Netherlands or Sweden), or can be chaotic and take horrendously long (Belgium does not have a working government for more than 2 years, Moldova for nearly 3 years).
Further, a fragmented party system will rarely lead to a single party forming a government on its own. All the negotiations will lead to compromises, with no party in effect getting to implement their agenda (what they promised their voters). Further, as parties need to have 'coalition potential' (see Sartori), they will have to make themselves compatible with others, reducing the diversity of their agendas (so voters, instead of choosing between to vastly different parties, will have to choose between seven or eight relatively similar parties).
However, this 'compatibility' of parties is also a good thing - in a two party system parties, to attract undecided voters, will tend to adopt extreme positions in certain matters, which, in the end, not only divides the political scene, but society as a whole (see what's going on in the US with GOP vs. Dems.).
Note, there are MANY advantages with more fragmented party systems (especially those of a centripetal tendency). You should definitely read Sartori's 1976 book (it's a relatively easy read, and, if you just want an overview, Sartori provides a good set of tables and concise explanations). The book is fundamental in political science, so you should find it in any university library.
The importance of a two-party system is very important within a governmental system. The split of the peoples interest can be found in the party-system. It gives the government a more diversified decision and it helps stop the rise in a majority rule. One group of determined people will find it extremely difficult to control the entirety of the public and therefore there will always be the conflict of interest. This is where the two-party system comes in handy. The party serving a persons best interest may alway be found and have a more diverse government. Once again i reiterate the importance of factions, this causes the general public to not be able to form a party that may even make it possible to overthrow the government.
Hope this helps!
it prevents a single national government from holding all of country's power.
Milan is an inland city. It has access to the Po river, as well as a few others. However, Venice has access to the Mediterranean Sea, through the Adriatic. This could be seen as an advantage.
A Well-defined infrastructure.
"A governmental system that prevents one branch from gaining more power over the other" is a good definition of the system of checks and balances.
The Patriots had some advantages over British mercenaries. The Patriots were familiar with the land and different terrains that would be helpful to stage battles.
a primary advantage of the electronic ignition system over conventional ignition system is?
If you loose the remote anyone can get in, but not if you have a password.
it helps to operate the application software and the system software of hte computer
reduced fraud
The main advantage of a 24V system over a 12V system is the ability to transmit power more efficiently over longer distances with reduced voltage drop. This can be especially beneficial in applications where power needs to be distributed over a large area or distance. Additionally, 24V systems may allow for the use of smaller gauge wires compared to 12V systems for the same power transmission, saving on installation costs.
The primary and basic advantage of electronic ignition system is that it reduces mechanical advantages and have more accuracy in delivering high voltage surges to the spark plug at higher RPM it has a fast switching device
it prevents a single national government from holding all of country's power.
One advantage is Windows Operating System provides a graphic user interface that allows people who aren't well-versed in programming to use computers. DOS is strictly lines of code.
Is that in goes in factors of 10. 1,000m=1k. English is all screwed up. 5280=1 mile.
The main advantage that the revenue sharing system had over federal grants in the aid programs was that there were fewer requirements. Both options were intended to provide federal moneys to the individual states.
Any majority party will always have an advantage over a minority party. This is because there are more people in the majority party so their vote out weighs that of the minority party.
The main advantage of ECL over TTL is speed.