Best Answer

Try to take over the school systems

User Avatar

Portia Baranowski

Lvl 6
4y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Black claims at the end of the dissent that as a result of the courts decision the court will?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Continue Learning about American Government

Who or what acquired power over all courts as a result of the Judiciary Act of 1789?

supreme court

The immediate result of the Brown v Board of Education decision was what?

Apex question: Answer removed, copyright infringement.

Minority students in public schools were given constitutional guarantees to equal educational opportunities as a result of the?

Decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

Which court hears misdemeanor cases involving small claims?

Small claims are filed in the court in your state where traffic matters are heard. The name of this court varies by state. In general, you must file your small claim in the court which has jurisdiction over the defendant's place of residence. However, if the small claim was the result of an automobile accident, the claim must be filed in the district where the accident occurred. And if the small claim was the result of a tenancy, it must be filed in the district where the rented property is located. If you have questions about the proper jurisdiction for a small claim, contact your local traffic court. They will be able to either help you or direct you to the court who can.

Why was the decision in Marbury v. Madison constitutionally important?

Marbury v. Madison, (1803) illustrates how the power of the Supreme Court, or the Federal Courts, depends not only on its constitutional authority, but on how the Constitution is interpreted, how the judicial branch avoids a confrontation with the other branches of government, and how the members of the court go about making a decision. The decision in the case established the right of judicial review for the federal courts. John Marshall, and the other members supporting his decision, ruled that the Supreme Court had no power to issue writs to compel public officials to do their duty, in this case awarding an appointment made by President Adams, because the Judicial Act of 1789 giving the court that power was unconstitutional. Marshall pointed out that the Constitution of the United States, Article III, pointed out precisely the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, and it did not mention issuing writs of the sort in this case. The result of the case was that a showdown with the Jeffersonians was avoided, one that the court might lose, and the power of the Supreme Court was clarified and increased.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.

Related questions

Black claims at the end of the dissent that as a result of the Court's decision the Court will?

Black claims that as a result of the Court's decision, the Court will have upset the constitutional balance and shifted more power to the President, weakening the checks and balances system.

What was a result of the Dred Scott decision?

Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.

What was a result of dred Scott decision?

Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.

How does satisficing decision differ from maximizing decision?

Satisficing decision means accepting a satisfactory, or good, result. Maximizing decision means not accepting any result except the best.

Why do most cases take place in state courts?

Most cases take place in state courts because the majority of legal issues involve state laws and regulations, such as criminal matters, family law disputes, and contract disputes. State courts have jurisdiction over these cases, while federal courts tend to focus on cases involving federal laws, constitutional issues, and disputes between parties from different states. Additionally, state courts are more accessible to individuals and businesses, making them a popular choice for resolving legal matters.

Which courts does the obiter dictum of a US Supreme Court decision bind?

None. Ratio decidendi sets forth the legal reasoning for the decision in a case. Obiter dictumis judicial opinion or incidental comments that are relevant, but not legally binding, because they're not part of the decision.The ratio decidendi creates binding precedent on all federal courts and on state courts of general jurisdiction, provided the decision involves a constitutional issue that is incorporated to the states, or becomes incorporated to the states as a result of that decision.For example, the US Supreme Court's decision in McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. ___ (2010) applied the Second Amendment to the States via the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause.

Is the result of a decision taken at the highest level?


What is the antonym of Decision matrix?

indecision result.

What is the result of a decision made or an action taken?


Which types of courts-martial may result in a felony conviction?

Special and General

Which is the result when the benefits of a decision are greater than the opportunity cost of that decision?

It would be helpful to know what the decision is to know what the benefits and opportunity of the decision are. It is important to include this information.

What is the auto insurance claims frequency?

Claims FrequencyIt refers to how often cliams are filed against your insurance policy. Frequent claims activity can result in cancellation or non renewal of your policy.