no
Actually there's record of former black slaves in Jamaica owning Rominchal gypsies as slaves during the 1650's. At that time a lot of western European nations (including England and Scotland) enslaved gypsies and sold them because they considered them a 'problem.'
They did! And in the USA! There are some census records that indicate quite a large percentage of free black slaves in some states (particularly Louisiana) owned slaves. You have to remember that at that time slavery was an accepted part of most societies not just in the Americas. Most black slaves brought over from Africa had likely owned slaves themselves, lived in towns and villages with slaves, or may have already been slaves. Slavery was rampant in the Middle East, parts of Asia, and even some parts of Europe. Here's a good site for you to look at, it has the census information on black slave owners dating back to 1790's.
Chat with our AI personalities
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
No. Anything a slave "owned" belonged to his master. However, as a freedman, a ex-slave could own land and other property.
In America, when they were freed.
No, only white men over 21 could own land. Women and slaves were unable to own property.
Both groups were able to own land and African slaves
yes women were considered citizens. They were allowed to own property and slaves. They too over the land when their husbands went to war.
Yes he did own slaves. Everyone that was wealthy at that time had slaves. Since he worked in congress and as a lawyer he was bound to make good money