He argued that the 1780s were a critical period not for the nation as a whole but rather for businessmen who feared that a weak decentralized government could harm economic interests. He claimed the constitution represents an economic document drawn with superb sill by men whose property interests were immediately at stake.
The founders of the Constitution formulated the document in a manner that fulfilled their economic endeavors.
What Beard meant when he said that the founding fathers were a conspiratorial economic elite, he simply meant that the founding fathers were out for the elite group of society. Most of the laws first set forth by the constitution were for the wealthy, not for the everyday people. The founding fathers were out for their own economic interests
15 president was Lincoln (Had a beard) 16 president was Johnson (no Beard) *17 president was Grant (had a Beard) *18 president was Hayes (had a beard) *19 president was Garfield (had a beard) 17th,18th,19th presidents had beards...
Charles Beard and John P. Roche give marvellous (opposing) opinons on this issue. Beard's writings can be found online in full (see first link below) but, as Roche is still alive he still is trying to make money off his ideas. Find "The Founding Fathers: A Reform Caucus in Action" in a library or at a book store for more info. (In other words, decide for yourself). http://www.vindicatingthefounders.com/library/index.asp?document=71 http://www.dushkin.com/text-data/catalog/0073102164.mhtml?SECTION=TOC -Political scientist John P. Roche asserts that the Founding Fathers were not only revolutionaries but also superb democratic politicians who created a Constitution that supported the needs of the nation and at the same time was acceptable to the people.
he claimed that the Framers were rich people who wrote the Constitution to benefit themselves
Charles Beard argued that the framers of the U.S. Constitution were wealthy landowners who sought to protect their economic interests. He believed that the Constitution reflected their desire to maintain their power and influence over the government, rather than truly serving the interests of the broader population. Beard's analysis emphasized the role of economic motivations in shaping the document.
Charles Beard argued that "an economic document drawn with superb skill by men whose property interests were immediately at stake." Source American government book.
Charles Beard argued that the heart of government in the United States started at the municipal level. Charles Beard also argued that history would repeat itself if people were not of a mind to change.
John P. Roche and Charles A Beard were early 21st century historians who had opposing views on the motivation of the framers of the U.S. Constitution. Roche argued that the framing of the Constitution was a democratic process taking into consideration a variety of state, political and economic interests all with the goal of creating a strong national government capable of meeting both the domestic and international needs of the country. Beard, on the other hand, argued that the framers were members of the wealthy, economic elite, and that the Constitution was designed to preserve their property rights. Beard argued that the Constitution was constructed to limit the power of majority rule by the people, given that the majority of people in any society will generally have less economic assets than the wealthy elite.
Charles Beard
Charles Beard argued that the founders who created the Constitution were rich landowners and lawyers who were solely after their own economic interests. He was not entirely wrong; some did in fact base their votes on the economic interests of their states. But most were modest men who were just thinking of a sturdy structure for their nation's government. For example, there were some wealthy politicians who refused to sign the Constitution even if, like Beard thought, would benefit his pocket.
Charles Beard 1913-1915 and his wife Mary Beard
He argued that the 1780s were a critical period not for the nation as a whole but rather for businessmen who feared that a weak decentralized government could harm economic interests. He claimed the constitution represents an economic document drawn with superb sill by men whose property interests were immediately at stake.
Charles Beard believed that the creators of the Constitution only worked to create wealth for themselves, rather than helping the rest of the nation.
The founders of the Constitution formulated the document in a manner that fulfilled their economic endeavors.
Charles beard was the person who killed the smith sisters