answersLogoWhite

0

Because he was afflicted with smallpox, it is probable that he was sterile.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
More answers

This is a really good question. I am a descendent of George Washington.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Maybe. Some historians think he could have, but there is no proof. The theory is that the boy was his brothers child.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

George Washington did not have any children at all.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Not likely. He never had any children with his wife - there is a good possibility that he was sterile due to a past illness.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

He did not. Washington never had any children, not even with his wife. It's believed he may have been sterile.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Maybe. There is one boy the could have been his or his brothers, but historians haven't been able to prove it one way or the other.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Yes

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Yes.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did George Washington father over 50 children with slaves?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp