answersLogoWhite

0

Because he was afflicted with smallpox, it is probable that he was sterile.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

ReneRene
Change my mind. I dare you.
Chat with Rene
EzraEzra
Faith is not about having all the answers, but learning to ask the right questions.
Chat with Ezra
ProfessorProfessor
I will give you the most educated answer.
Chat with Professor
More answers

This is a really good question. I am a descendent of George Washington.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Maybe. Some historians think he could have, but there is no proof. The theory is that the boy was his brothers child.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

George Washington did not have any children at all.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
User Avatar

Not likely. He never had any children with his wife - there is a good possibility that he was sterile due to a past illness.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

He did not. Washington never had any children, not even with his wife. It's believed he may have been sterile.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Maybe. There is one boy the could have been his or his brothers, but historians haven't been able to prove it one way or the other.

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago
User Avatar

Yes

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
User Avatar

Yes.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Did George Washington father over 50 children with slaves?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp