0
Yes Molly Pitcher used a cannon when her husbend John fell to the ground because of the heat. Molly started to swab and lode. George Washington heard of this and from then on she was know as a Sergeant .
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Lao
Rene
BlakeMolly Hayes, best known by the name of "Molly Pitcher," was made a legend at the Battle of Monmoth during the Revolutionary War.
During the battle, she ignored the dangers and used a pitcher to bring water to men who were wounded and exhausted.
When her husband, John Hayes, fell from the extreme heat, Molly took over his position at a cannon. She kept her vigil at the cannon, firing and cleaning it out most of the rest of the day...until night came and the firing stopped.
Eventually, she was recognized for her bravery and has been known by many as "Molly Pitcher."
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What heroic act did Molly Pitcher perform during the battle of monmouth in june 1778?
Molly Pitcher originally just carried water for the soldiers. During the battle her husband was wounded while firing a cannon. Molly ran over and took over the cannon and began firing and loading the cannon.
Which of these achievements was crucial to the Ottoman Turks' ability to capture Byzantine cities in the 15th century?
The use of gun powder
What things in America should all people be informed about?
recently gun crime has been an issue as people have heard on hte news. people should be more aware of the dangers and maybe think about preventing gun use in the usa as it is allowed more than in other countries.
What is the term use when a person votes for every candidate on the ballot from his or her own political party?
One term is "bullet voting", because the voter goes straight down the line of candidates just like a bullet from a gun. Another term is "line voting", which comes from the same concept but also has the connotation of voting the entire line of candidates.
To what extent is that truism exemplified in the shared perspectives (on states rights and federal power) of the marijuana entrepreneur in Oakland and gun-rights activist in Montana?
The shared perspectives of the marijuana entrepreneur in Oakland and gun-rights activist in Montana on states rights and federal power could vary widely depending on the specifics of their respective positions. The marijuana entrepreneur in Oakland likely views states rights as a means to protect their business’s ability to remain in operation, as marijuana is still illegal on the federal level. This entrepreneur may be in favor of states having the right to make their own laws regarding marijuana, as it would help their business remain viable. Meanwhile, the gun-rights activist in Montana may view states rights as a way to protect their Second Amendment rights from federal encroachment. This perspective would likely be rooted in a desire to keep the federal government from passing laws that could impede the ability of individuals to own and use firearms. In terms of federal power, the marijuana entrepreneur in Oakland may be wary of too much federal power, as it could lead to new laws that might make their business illegal. On the other hand, the gun-rights activist in Montana may support an increased role of the federal government in protecting their Second Amendment rights, as they could view it as a means of ensuring that their rights are not infringed upon. Overall, the shared perspectives of the marijuana entrepreneur in Oakland and gun-rights activist in Montana on states rights and federal power could vary greatly depending on their respective positions and the specifics of the issue at hand.
