The Constitutional Amendment that resulted from the Quartering Act is the Third: "No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
you shouldnt even be on answers .com you should be on bing.com what now they never answer any of the questions i ask
The British further angered American colonists with the Quartering Act, which required the colonies to provide barracks and supplies to British troops. The Quartering Act was passed in June 2, 1765, against the wishes of the colonist. The Quartering Act was an indirect tax for the colonist. Under the law, the colonist had to give quarters, food, and transportation to the British soldiers. The British forced the colonist to accept it because they were protecting the colonists from the French. The colonists did not consider the French a threat and did not like the idea of paying for the British protection.
yes:)
The second navigation act Advanced Academics Student
YES THEY WERE TO DIFFERENT QUARTERING ACTS THE FIRST QUARTERING ACT OCCORED ON MARCH 24 1764 AND THE SECOUND QUARTERING ACT HAPPENED JUNE 2 1774
----
The Quartering Act was a bill passed stating "All colonists are to house and supply any soldier in need."
Many colonists did not like the Quartering Act law and did not follow it. This did not cause them to get into any trouble rather because of their non-compliance the act expired in 1767.
Quartering act is about that all the British troops will get housing by colonists. the troops can live in any house they want. ad they don't have to pay for anything. they will get food, salt, and bedding for free.
The Quartering Act is a name given to a minimum of two Acts of British Parliament in the 18th century. Parliament enacted them to order local governments of the American colonies to provide the British soldiers with any needed accommodations. It also required citizens to provide food for any British soldiers in the area. Each of the Quartering Acts was an amendment to the Mutiny Act and required annual renewal by Parliament. They were originally intended as a response to issues that arose during the French and Indian War and soon became a source of tension between the inhabitants of the Thirteen Colonies and the government in London, England. These tensions would later fuel the fire that led to the Revolutionary War.
The Constitutional Amendment that resulted from the Quartering Act is the Third: "No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
in 1767 the new york assembly decided not to approve any funds for salt vinegar and liquor.
They were sent because of the quartering act which was a act that the colonists had to give food and shelter to the troops and because the troops were to watch over the colonists so they won't rebel or -protest or any against things.
How about "Keep the Redcoats out of our living rooms, and our privacy intact!" It's catchy, to the point, and sticks it to those British soldiers wanting to crash on our couches without permission. Just say no to unwanted house guests, am I right?
"Relating to" typically refers to the act of connecting or establishing a relationship with something, whereas "related to" usually implies a connection or association between two things. In essence, "relating to" involves the process of making a connection, while "related to" describes an existing connection or relationship.
Do you mean now, in the 21st Century? It is not an appropriate punishment for any crime at any time. Capital punishment is practiced by some nations and this is controversial enough. Quartering is utterly barbaric.