0
The Declaration of Independence does give a hint:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness....But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.[emphasis added]
And, a warning:
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution, as drafted and kept in the National Archives does suggest a hint as well:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [emphasis added]
What else can I help you with?
How does the constitution reflect the fear of making the country leaders too strong?
The Constitution features a system of checks and balances which provide a check on the leaders of the country whether they are in Congress, the President or military leaders. The military leaders are checked by having to report to the President and are subject to dismissal at the President's discretion. The President is checked by having no power to pass laws and no way to stop Congress from over-riding his vetoes. He is also subject to removal from office by the Congress.The Constitution uses the Separation of Powers doctrine to prevent any one branch of the government from becoming too strong.
Removal of the members of the executive branch of the government?
There is only one member of the executive branch of American government- the president. Removal of that branch violates the system of checks and balances provided by the Founding Fathers. If you're talking about assassinations, that's also illegal and would be ineffective at "removing" the executive office from government.
Which of the five purposes of government is served when government provides roads electricity postal service parks and trash removal?
Public services
What is the worst punishment that can come from an impeachment?
impeachment can't extend any further than removal of office The U.S Constitution Article:1 Section:3
Why did treatment of Cherokee get a worse after the supreme court declared Georgia's Indian removal laws to be unconstitutional?
The federal government
What do the articles in the constitution explain?
The seven articles of the United States Constitution lays out the process for forming and running the government. They address the branches of government, the formation of laws, the interactions between the states and federal government, and effectiveness of the document.
How did the government respond to the Cherokee Constitution?
The U.S. government initially recognized the Cherokee Constitution, which was adopted in 1827, as a legitimate document that established the Cherokee Nation as a sovereign entity. However, this recognition was short-lived, as tensions grew over land rights and state encroachment. In subsequent years, the government increasingly disregarded the constitution, leading to the forced removal of the Cherokee people during the Trail of Tears in the late 1830s, which violated the rights outlined in their constitution. Ultimately, the government's response was one of oppression and displacement rather than respect for Cherokee sovereignty.
Why was the Cherokee Nations constitution discarded after originally being accepted by the U.S. Government?
The Cherokee Nation's constitution was initially accepted by the U.S. Government in 1827, but it was later discarded due to the increasing pressure from state governments and the federal government for Indian removal. The discovery of gold in Georgia and the desire for land by white settlers intensified these pressures, leading to the forced relocation of the Cherokee people along the Trail of Tears. The U.S. Government prioritized expansion and economic interests over the sovereignty and legal rights established by the Cherokee Constitution.
What did Cherokee do to resist the removal?
to resist removal they sued the government,wrote a protest letter and jackson ignored this and made them leave!
How did the federal government implement the idian removal act act in 1838?
The Government enforced the Indian removal act by threatening them. Those who didn't move willingly were forced out of their territory on "The Trail Of Tears"
List of government jobs?
police,teacher,doctor,refuse removal,
Why was impeachment made a part of the constitution?
To allow the orderly removal of federal officials who were incompetent / corrupt / criminal.
How does the constitution reflect the fear of making the country leaders too strong?
The Constitution features a system of checks and balances which provide a check on the leaders of the country whether they are in Congress, the President or military leaders. The military leaders are checked by having to report to the President and are subject to dismissal at the President's discretion. The President is checked by having no power to pass laws and no way to stop Congress from over-riding his vetoes. He is also subject to removal from office by the Congress.The Constitution uses the Separation of Powers doctrine to prevent any one branch of the government from becoming too strong.
What are limits of state governments?
Speaking in terms of the United States Constitution, states with the USA cannot pass laws that contradict laws and regulations that are specifically intended for the US Federal government. By the same token, all powers not given to the Federal government are left for the US states to deal with. For example, states in the USA may create laws concerning violations of state statutes. The imposition of a sales tax or its removal is a state decision. With that said, the creation of tariffs falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal government as it is written in the US Constitution.
How was the indian removal act violated on many occasions?
Many tribes signed the removal treaties. However, the Cherokee Nation refused and fought the government in courts.
Henry Clay argued that actions of President Jackson including his enforcement of the Indian Removal Act were?
(Apex) Against the Constitution
What is the removal of some government controls over a market called?
It's called Deregulation
