answersLogoWhite

0

They bribed state and local officials in return for government appointments.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is a true that a chief goal of political bosses was to give more power to voters?

No, it's not true that a chief goal of political bosses was to give more power to voters. Political bosses typically sought to maintain control over political machines and influence elections to benefit their interests and those of their supporters. Their focus was often on consolidating power and ensuring loyalty rather than empowering the electorate.


Were political bosses a help or menace to the cities they ran?

Most political bosses were a menace to their cities. They were just in it for the money and to hold power.


How did urban political machines gain power and how did immigrants middle-class reformers and political bosses view them?

knk


How did urban political machine gain power and how did immigrants middle class reformers and political bosses view them?

knk


Why do you think political parties are not as powerful as they were in the past?

Primary elections have taken away some of the power of party bosses.


During the nineteenth century one way political bosses gained voter supported was by what?

During the nineteenth century, political bosses often gained voter support through patronage and the provision of social services. They would offer jobs, financial aid, and other forms of assistance to constituents in exchange for their votes. This system created a network of loyalty and dependence, allowing bosses to maintain power by ensuring that their supporters were satisfied and engaged. Additionally, they often exploited ethnic and immigrant communities, providing them with resources and representation in return for political allegiance.


Did political bosses rig elections?

Yes, political bosses historically rigged elections to maintain power and control over political processes. They often employed tactics such as voter intimidation, ballot stuffing, and manipulating registration rolls to ensure their preferred candidates won. This practice was particularly prevalent in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States, where corrupt political machines operated in major cities. These actions undermined democratic principles and led to widespread calls for electoral reforms.


What is the main idea of the document why the ward boss rules?

The main idea of the document "Why the Ward Boss Rules" is to explain the significance of ward bosses in urban political machines in the early 20th century United States. It highlights how ward bosses held immense power over local communities through their control of services, jobs, and resources, allowing them to influence elections and maintain their authority. The document underscores the complex relationship between ward bosses, political parties, and urban residents.


How did urban pollitical machines gain power and how did immigrants middle-class reformers and political bosses view them?

corruption or graft


The adoption of which progressive reform denied political bosses the power to pick their partys candidates for general elections?

secret ballot


What were the leaders of political machines called?

The leaders of political machines were commonly referred to as "bosses." These bosses wielded significant influence over political processes and often controlled party nominations, appointments, and services in exchange for votes and loyalty from constituents. They operated mainly in urban areas during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, leveraging patronage and a network of loyal supporters to maintain power. Prominent examples include figures like Boss Tweed in New York City.


What did political bosses fear about women getting the right to vote?

Political bosses feared that women getting the right to vote would disrupt their power structures and challenge their control over elections. They were concerned that women would advocate for policies that could threaten their influence and lead to shifts in political dynamics.