Historical globalization has been both positive and negative, depending on a person's opinion.
Chat with our AI personalities
Undoubtedly the historian's document is a positive and strong source of evidence for historical interpretation provided it is not affected by personal prejudices, selfish national interests or affiliations. History is seldom honest. Mostly it has been mis-interpreted and distorted because of certain vested interests - may be it be the history of Aryans, Greek, Roman or American History
Political globalization refers to the increasing number and power of human associations which influence or govern the world as a whole. Thus, it has been noted that in 1909 there were 37 inter-governmental organisations (IGOs) and 176 international non-governmental organisations (INGOs), by 1996 there were 260 IGOs and 5,472 INGOs (Held at al. 1999; p.53).
Once an event has been written down, it becomes historical. Before that, events were made into poems and songs and passed down and they became mythological. A good example are the stories of King Arthur.
A reduction in anarchy or any growth in radical networks would have been a positive outcome of the Palmer raids. A lot of the efforts carried out by the Palmer raids were written off and some liens were denounced.
There have been numorous references to historical events used as background information for many things. If you would give tell me more about what you are needing to know I would be glad to help you.