answersLogoWhite

0

this concerns the complex question of memories, legacy and lasting images.Take Kennedy and Nixon,for example, one seen as full of youthful promise, a fresh approach, a dynamic,charismatic leader-Nixon,by contrast , as the scheming,manipulative,machiavellian,opportunistic chancer whose ambitions defeated any shreds of integrity he might have once possessed.But are these stereotypes?If they leave a legacy of powerful images annd memories,are these realistic,rooted in reality, or prime examples of the triumph of style over substance? You decide.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

BeauBeau
You're doing better than you think!
Chat with Beau
JordanJordan
Looking for a career mentor? I've seen my fair share of shake-ups.
Chat with Jordan
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How can a President influence a country long after he leaves office?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp