answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Hostile. The nine Lochner-era justices Roosevelt inherited from earlier administrations opposed most of his New Deal legislation, declaring six of the eight major Acts unconstitutional. The 1935 and 1936 Terms were especially brutal, but the Court began to shift toward a more progressive stance in 1937, as the older justices retired and were replaced.

Roosevelt appointed eight new, liberal, justices between 1937 and 1943, beginning a progressive era that lasted into the 1970s.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How could the US Supreme Court's attitude toward federal economic intervention be characterized during the early years of the New Deal?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What period in roman history was characterized by having one supreme ruler?

There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.There were two periods in Roman history that were characterized by having one supreme ruler. They were the monarchy and the principate.


What was President Jackson's attitude toward the Supreme Court's decision in Worcester v Georgia?

defiant.


What effect did the supreme court have on economic development?

Some effects that the supreme court had on economic development were that the rulings reinforced capitalism as the ruling economic system in the U.S. Somewhere in the early 1800s, the Supreme Court made several rulings that helped define federal power over contracts and commerce. As aforementioned, these rulings reinforced capitalism as the ruling economic system in the United States.


How did the slaughterhouse cases affect American businessess?

businesses had rights but no responsibilities


Why did the supreme court extend the commerce clause to include a wide range of economic activities?

because


What does SHIELD in the Avengers movies stand for?

The acronym for SHIELD has taken on different meanings over the years. Orignally it stood for Supreme Headquarters, International Espionage, Law-Enforcement Division. It was changed in 1991 to Strategic Hazard Intervention Espionage Logistics Directorate. Today it stands for stands for Strategic Homeland Intervention, Enforcement and Logistics Division


Why we're precedents set by the Supreme Court with Marshall as chief justice important?

They influenced the legal and economic systems in the united states


What were some of the economic and social issues the US Supreme Court considered in its interpretation of the 14th Amendment in the 1880s and 1890s?

it was about equal rights


Why does the US Supreme Court sometimes reverse its earlier decisions?

court decision reflect changing social political and economic condition


What was Andrew Jackson's attitude toward nullification?

Andrew Jackson was against nullification, as long as it served his own purposes. Jackson became infamous for nullifying the Supreme Court decision in favor of the Cherokee nation. He is noted for saying something to the effect, "Let the Supreme Court enforce their decision."


How did the Supreme Court ruling in Darthmouth College v Woodward support economic growth?

It supported economic growth by it giving the national government power to protect private contracts and so New Hampshire couldn't do any thing to it


What has generally been the supreme courts attitude toward prior restraint?

Supreme Court decisions over the past 75 years clearly support the presumption of the unconstitutionality of prior restraint