congress tried to remedy the lack of a legal basis for its existance.
The phrase is actually 'we the people.' With these words, the United States Constitution established its authority on the basis of popular sovereignty.
The Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution is where the implied powers of the national government are inferred from. It states that Congress has the authority to make all necessary and proper laws to carry out its powers, and has served as a basis for many national programs and policies.
To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt>
It depends on what type of government the country has-it could be president, dictator, tyrant, etc.
The Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, allows the federal government to expand its powers beyond those explicitly enumerated in the Constitution. Found in Article I, Section 8, this clause grants Congress the authority to make laws that are necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers, thereby enabling a flexible interpretation of federal authority. This has been the basis for numerous landmark decisions and legislation, allowing the government to adapt to changing circumstances and needs.
congress tried to remedy the lack of a legal basis for its existance.
inference that it can because the constitution does not say that it cannot
Because the cabinet and the president personally work together on a regular basis, so cooperation is ensured if the president has the authority in this instance.
The basis for the implied powers of Congress primarily stems from the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Commerce Clause found in the U.S. Constitution. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) grants Congress the ability to make laws that are necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) allows Congress to regulate interstate commerce, which has been interpreted broadly to expand federal authority over various economic activities. Together, these clauses provide a foundation for Congress to enact legislation beyond its explicitly listed powers.
1. Natural Authority 2. Constitutional Authority 3. Statutory Authority
The U.S. Code is a compilation of federal laws organized by subject matter. It serves as a comprehensive reference for statutory laws enacted by Congress and is updated periodically to reflect new legislation. The Code is divided into titles, each addressing specific areas of law, such as taxation, labor, or national defense. Its basis lies in the Constitution, which grants Congress the authority to create and enact federal laws.
The phrase is actually 'we the people.' With these words, the United States Constitution established its authority on the basis of popular sovereignty.
The basis for assessments is provided through feedback.
The influence technique that occurs when a leader establishes their authority as the basis for a request is known as legitimizing. This involves leveraging their position or title to emphasize the importance of compliance.
The Clause that allows Congress to do what is necessary and proper is known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the U.S. Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power to make laws that are necessary for executing its enumerated powers and responsibilities. It provides flexibility for Congress to adapt and legislate effectively in response to changing circumstances. This has been the basis for many important laws and interpretations of federal authority.
Organize
democraty