Stuff
Both groups thought that parliament was more then they could handle because of taxes. None of the two groups liked taxes and wanted to do away with them.But loyalists remained loyal to the king and did as they were told without arguments.As Patriots took a stand!
The Liberal Party favoured social reform, personal liberty, reducing the powers of the Crown and the Church of England (many of them were Nonconformists) and an extension of the electoral franchise. The Conservative Party was just the opposite.
killa
It is the reincarnation
how dose trying a case in small claims court differ from trying a case in a court of record
The British ruled directly over their colonies, while the French did not.
AIM used tactics that were often confrontational and violent.
british constitution differ from the US Constitution is that they dont have rule
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The fighting in the South was less vicious.
The Declaration of Independence contrasted greatly with earlier patriot writings because the British Parliament was not mentioned, as if Great Britain never had complete control over the colonies. Instead, the authors accused King George of many offenses.
The British ruled directly over their colonies, while the French did not.
They used guerilla tactics
They used guerilla tactics
British viewed their Indian subject as resentment
The Patriot version of the Boston Massacre depicted the event as a brutal attack by British soldiers on innocent colonists, emphasizing themes of oppression and tyranny. They portrayed the soldiers as aggressors who fired into a crowd of peaceful protesters, framing the incident as a catalyst for the American Revolution. In contrast, the Loyalist version characterized the soldiers as acting in self-defense against a violent mob, suggesting that the colonists provoked the confrontation. This perspective aimed to justify British actions and maintain loyalty to the Crown.