answersLogoWhite

0

Fortas defend the majority opinion that free speech in school is constitutionally protected by saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to ...

User Avatar

Herman Homenick

Lvl 10
5y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
BlakeBlake
As your older brother, I've been where you are—maybe not exactly, but close enough.
Chat with Blake
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
More answers

By saying that such an expression isn't disruptive to class -APEX

User Avatar

“by arguing that First Amendment rights apply to both teachers and students” apex:)

User Avatar

garfieldluvr69

Lvl 6
3y ago
User Avatar

by citing a similar case, West Virginia v. Barnette, in which the Court decided that students are not required to salute the flag (apex)

User Avatar

ZULEMA RAMIREZ

Lvl 7
3y ago
User Avatar

by argueing that First Amendment rights apply to both teachers and students

User Avatar

dragonman

Lvl 4
5y ago
User Avatar

by arguing that First Amendment rights apply to both teachers and students. -apex

User Avatar

Grace Carlson

Lvl 5
4y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How does Fortas defend the majority decision that free-speech in school is constitutionally protected?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp