This becomes a case of 'who judges he judges' Congress is SO CURRUPTED by pork barrels, it CAN NOT be counted to represent the welfare of the people who elected them, but the money filth who bribe them.
Chat with our AI personalities
Pork barrel can be used in different ways, good or bad. Building roads, bridges, classrooms, etc. are one of the benefits people can get in the pork barrel, but it can also be used to buy luxuries of the congressman since this PDAF (pork barrel) is not even being audited. In making bridges, they can use only small amount of money and keep the remaining in their own pockets as well as in making their "other projects". Well that's the bad side of that pork barrel in terms of helping congressmen. but the good side of it, it can help congressmen make new projects that are much helpful to every citizen of the state aside from improving roads and bridges.
pork-barrel legislation
Pork barrel projects
It's short for "pork barrel spending." A pork project is something paid for by federal dollars that only benefits a limited number of citizens, and that the greater majority of the citizens sees as unnecessary.
Typically, 'pork' involves funding for government programs whose economic or service benefits are concentrated in a particular area but whose costs are spread among all taxpayers. Public works projects, certain national defense spending projects, and agricultural subsidies are the most commonly cited examples. Pork is often identified as a key cause of government waste in the United States, specifically by funding programs which were not requested, authorised, competitively awarded, exceeding the budget, not subject to congressional hearings, and/or only serve a local, special interest.
In politics, the biggest disadvantage is that it leads to bargaining for projects to be done and leads to wasteful and irresponsible spending.