National political leaders have the most serious external issue with regards to national defense. At all costs their nation must be able to be secure from external threats. National leaders and their military leaders and consultants should constantly meet and make sound decisions concerning national defense.
I think military leaders should override the president's decision because the president is known as a piece of *-_+
Adam Smith. CAVA
States' rights were very important to the South, who believed that the fed government definitely should NOT be able to finalize decisions about states' affairs. Each state is soverign and should have the right to make its own decisions in regard to its own affairs. The refusal of the union to recognize these rights led indirectly to the War between the States, 1861-1865.
People should be able to choose thier own leaders. APEX =D
the doctrine of judicial restrain holds that judges should generally defer to precedent and to decisions made by legislature
National political leaders have the most serious external issue with regards to national defense. At all costs their nation must be able to be secure from external threats. National leaders and their military leaders and consultants should constantly meet and make sound decisions concerning national defense.
bakwass question
They should've been ready for anything that's what today's military leaders need to know.
Answer 1The assertion is that Hamas locates military assets in civilian zones. There is no reason to expect that Hamas or Israeli leaders should not live among civilians. Leaders and statesmen are usually not considered valid military targets.Answer 2The question misunderstands the assertion. It is not that Hamas Leaders locate themselves in civilian areas that is the issue, but that rockets and missiles are launched from civilian zones. As a result, Israel finds that in destroying the weaponry, there are civilian casualties. Additionally, Hamas adds to the carnage by specifically choosing places like schools where the innocents involved will be women and/or children. Israeli leaders usually put missile batteries, military airstrips, and other war-related technologies outside of civilian zones (like most countries) so that conflict will not involve civilian casualties.Note that unlike certain others, Israel does all it can to avoid targeting civilians.
they wanted to weaken Germany so it could not rebuild it's military.
Government should refrain from intervening in the economy, leaving all major decisions to the individual business leaders.
Government should refrain from intervening in the economy, leaving all major decisions to the individual business leaders.
Government should refrain from intervening in the economy, leaving all major decisions to the individual business leaders.
I think military leaders should override the president's decision because the president is known as a piece of *-_+
"Indian" should be capitalized but "leaders" shouldn't be. The specific names of the leaders should be capitalized.
From a policy perspective, the military in America has always been subordinate to the civil government. Thus, military policy is always set by civilians in the US. A significant, though not the most important, reason for this is that military leaders may be inclined to win at the cost of regional or worldwide political and diplomatic stability. The question should actually be reversed; "Why do military leaders think they can make foreign policy decisions." The main purpose for civilian control of the military, of course, is that countries with an independent, or worse yet, dominant military, nearly always experience prolonged periods of coup de tat and dictatorship. As to the specifics of the Vietnam War and the anti-war movement, private citizens elect the civil government that gives the military it's orders. The civil government ordered the military to fight a war that was unpopular. Private citizens expressed their opposition to the war. Since the government answer to the citizens, it eventually did what they wanted.
The doctrine of no surprises refers to the principle that government officials should inform their superiors of any developments or decisions that may catch them off guard. This ensures that leaders are kept informed and can make well-informed decisions. It promotes transparency and accountability within the government.