if it became an unitary government then there's would be no states to start with. There will one central focus of power in the United State, most likely Washington, DC. All the powers that government have will be focused on the federal level.
that's just the basic of this topic. there's many controversial issues as to if this kind of government is better than the current government in the US.
An example of unitary is system of government is the United Kingdom. Actually, not anymore. The UK is more of a federal system with a weak state government. A better example is France, which has a very strong unitary system, with a powerful central government, and regional governments which are directly responsible to the national government.
No, a unitary system of government is centralized and usually presented as a counterpart to federalism. Unitary countries utilize a strong national government that holds complete authority over local governments, and devolves/reserves powers at will.This is in contrast to federations (countries that operate under federalist systems) where the national government works in tandem with local governments, and both retain explicitly reserved powers that neither can infringe upon. In the US, states maintain significance influence on internal affairs under this system, a privilege they would be unable to enjoy if the US were a unitary country.Current examples of unitary countries include the United Kingdom, France, and China. Examples of federations include the United States, Russia, and (according to some) the European Union as a political entity.
The government would have become a tyranny if there was no separation of powers
Money would become unimportant and the value of our currency would plummet.
Checks and balances was created so no branch of government would become to powerful.
A unitary government might be either democratic or dictatorial in form by the fact that it is governed by a single body.
why should a political system be unitary federal or confederal, because a federal system would allow the state would not be a single fraction, state government would be smaller and more reposnive to local needs.
An example of unitary is system of government is the United Kingdom. Actually, not anymore. The UK is more of a federal system with a weak state government. A better example is France, which has a very strong unitary system, with a powerful central government, and regional governments which are directly responsible to the national government.
A Unitary Government is a government where the power is held by one central authority. This happens a lot in a dictatorship, but some democracies also have them, like Great Britain. Unitary government: a system of government where there is a single system of administration, law, money, and measurement.
Look you uneducationed person, it is because unitary system of government is a one-level system of governing and Canada is a federal system which needs a two level system.
A confederacy or federation is a group of independent powers united in common interest. This is how the United States began, as a confederacy of sovereign states. A unitary government is a single government that has total control over a single country, with smaller government branches merely being an extention of the central government. One may argue that the United States Federal Government of today has more in common with a unitary government than it's name would imply.
The short answer is that if the united states became a unitary state it would no longer be "united states" but rather the "united state." Perhaps some successor state occupying a portion of what was once the US could be a unitary state, but the likelihood of all the constitute parts of the US voluntarily relinquishing their legislative and administrative prerogative is minute.
No, a unitary system of government is centralized and usually presented as a counterpart to federalism. Unitary countries utilize a strong national government that holds complete authority over local governments, and devolves/reserves powers at will.This is in contrast to federations (countries that operate under federalist systems) where the national government works in tandem with local governments, and both retain explicitly reserved powers that neither can infringe upon. In the US, states maintain significance influence on internal affairs under this system, a privilege they would be unable to enjoy if the US were a unitary country.Current examples of unitary countries include the United Kingdom, France, and China. Examples of federations include the United States, Russia, and (according to some) the European Union as a political entity.
Even more so in fact. The existence of a single political arm would allow for heavy misuse of the ability to appoint individuals to office. There would not be checks and balances that our government permits to prevent such abuses
people where scared
Unitary matrices leave the expectation value unchanged. We need the mixing matrix to be unitary (to preserve the mixed quarks as a basis, to preserve length); if VCKM were not unitary, it would perhaps suggest that a fourth generation of quarks needed to be considered or included.
Unitary gov. all the power in the government is held by the central government (China and Japan)!