If you were in rizal place would you have supported the katipunan?

If bonifacio did not start the katipunan who among our heroes then at that time would have most likely started it why?

If Bonifacio had not started the katipunan, Jose Rizal would have started it.

First civic organization founded by jose rizal?

In 1892 Jose Rizal formed a civic movement called La Liga Filipina. The civic organization that subsequently gave birth to the Katipunan led by Andres Bonifacio. The Katipunan was a secret society which would start the Philippine Revolution against Spain.

If the katipunan has not prematurely discovered in 1892 what do you think could have happened to the revolution of bonifacio?

If the katipunan had not been prematurely discovered in 1892, the revolution of Bonifacio would not have succeeded.

Rizal or bonifacio?

Both Jose Rizal and Andres Bonifacio were important figures in Philippine history during the fight against Spanish colonization. Rizal advocated for reform through his writings, while Bonifacio was a revolutionary leader who sought direct action. Ultimately, both contributed in different ways to the fight for Philippine independence.

Why is their is Rizal subject?

So that the students would learn more about Rizal and shall know the life of Rizal...

Why would Rizal criticize today society?

Rizal as a political philosopher

Why was the mother of Rizal opposed to his higher education?

Rizal's mother, Teodora Alonso, was initially opposed to his higher education in Europe because she feared for his safety and well-being in a foreign land. She was also concerned about the financial burden it would place on the family.

What are the misconception in the life of Rizal?

Maraming humahanga sa pagkabayani ni Jose Rizal. Ngunit Hindi lahaty ay sumasangayon sa kanyang pagkahirang bilang pambansang bayani ng Pilipinas. Ang naging basehan ng mga protesta ng mga taong tumututol sa paghirang kay Rizal ay ang mga Hindi tuwid niyang mga gawain partikular na ang pangbababae. Narito ang isang pahayag ni Antonio Alonzo ukol sa mga miskonsepsyon kay Rizal. Nagmula ito sa sulating "Rizal, the Armed Rebel" na lumabas ng taong 1999. ************************************************************************************************************ It has now become fashionable for anyone, to show-off their knowledge of Philippine history as non-conventional by declaring the Philippine National Hero as a PACIFIST or REFORMER. This then is immediately followed by, "….the national hero should have been Andres Bonifacio….". Arguments like it was the Americans(William Howard Taft, the governor of the American Colonial government of the Philippines) who selected him to be a national hero as the "SAFE" selection. More, Rizal's own sentiments (as accused by an American writer)show Rizal believed that only a reform from above is feasible in the Philippines. Other writings went even as far as condemning Dr. Rizal for not joining the Katipunan thus shows total ignorance of the events leading to the Philippine revolution. At the outset, it seems this "radical" thought is truly from "enlightened" minds. But further research shows Dr. Jose Rizal was truly, without a doubt the Philippine National Hero. The reason for the revolution, the reason why our forefathers (and mothers)took up arms and risked their lives and the reason the Philippines won independence from Spain. But FACTS are: Dr. Jose Rizal was NOT AGAINST a Bloody revolution. He was against an unprepared rebellion that may cost unnecessary lives. Although, being a learned man, this road may seem remote from his usual petit bourgeois lifestyle, his only concern was only for his fellow countrymen. This is much more so understood as he had relatives, even his youngest sister Josefa and a sister in law and his eldest brother, Paciano who eventually led the same rebels against the Spaniards and the Americans, as members of the Katipunan. His concern was much more about the success of a Bloody revolution and quick expulsion of the Spanish friars. He abhors needless sufferings by being unprepared and advised Andres Bonifacio to buy ships and arms and gather more funds (sources of fundings came from Dr. Rizal himself and this tactic was followed religiously by Bonifacio) before plunging the whole country to rebellion. One must understand that Andres Bonifacio, the founder of the Katipunan, was a member of Dr. Jose Rizal's "La Liga Filipina". And it was only when Dr. Rizal was arrested that Bonifacio became dissolutioned and that he decided for himself that truly peaceful means will not work and organized the Katipunan, the day after Dr. Rizal's arrest for an armed resistance. Bonifacio sought advice from Dr. Jose Rizal routinely and those that condemn Dr. Rizal for not "joining" the Katipunan is really amiss at best. It is worth nothing that the codes and structure of Katipunan is patterned after Freemasonry. Bonifacio is not a mason, much less had any idea of how this "secret" society is structured. Dr. Jose Rizal is a Freemason and had been ex-communicated by the Friars for being so. More, it is interesting that Dr. Jose Rizal's sentiments in his early writings are clearly reflected in the Code of the Katipunan. It is hard to imagine that a man who would devote so much time, effort and detail in his second novel, "El Filibusterismo", the conceptualization, the feasibilty, the planning and the execution of Philippine Revolution to be totally against it. And he skillfully lit the fire and fury in his readers' heart by ending the novel with an ending that nobody wants. an ending , that gives up! It is such a strong 'CALL FOR ACTION' that anybody who misses that is missing a lot more than Dr. Rizal's desire of Freedom. Just because Dr. Rizal was not a member of the Katipunan does not necessarily mean he had nothing to do with it or influence in it the least bit. We must remember, that during the VERY FIRST CELEBRATION of PHILIPPINE INDEPENDENCE DAY on June 12, 1899 at RITZ THEATER in BUSTILLOS, SAMPALOC MANILA, all the Generals, and heroes who where still alive where all there proclaiming Dr. Jose Rizal as the "NATIONAL HERO. Yes, it was years before the Americans declared him as such. It must be remembered that Rizal's founding of the Liga Filipina was the prime catalyst for the mobilization of the Katipunan led by Andres Bonifacio and other separatists (note that Mabini was present when Rizal initiated the Liga). And Antonio Luna, the brilliant general of Aguinaldo's army of the first Philippine Republic, was already in contact with Rizal in Europe when Rizal was an active collaborator of Marcelo del Pilar and Graciano Lopez Jaena in La Solidaridad. First Luna in 1884: "Assimilating his ideas, pondering his concepts that readily aroused our enthusiasm, we found an echo, though timid, of his voice within ourselves." And Mabini in 1899: "While we Filipinos living today do not individually amount to as much as Rizal, yet we can join together to get the force necessary to the realization of the work begun by him." I second Luna's multiplication of Rizal's voice and Mabini's motion of unifying and mobilizing our forces for national-democratic self-determination.* (*last paragraph from E. San Juan Jr., Rizal in Our Times, Anvil Publications, 1997)

Why Jose Rizal University named after rizal?

Jose Rizal University is named after the Philippines' national hero, Jose Rizal, to honor his contributions to the country's independence movement and his role as a symbol of Filipino nationalism and patriotism. Rizal's ideals of education, freedom, and social justice align with the university's mission and vision, making him a fitting namesake.

Would it be possible for rizal to escape while in exile in dapitan?

Yes!it may possible if he will so but Rizal is not willing of it.

How would you describe the family of rizal?

it's cool

Did Jose Rizal really retract why?

Although evidences of Jose Rizal's retraction are widely distributed, many scholars who studied Rizal, believe otherwise. Rizal's willingness to die for his motherland showed that he would not compromise his beliefs through a retraction.

If you were in rizal place would you have supported the katipunan?

Add your answer:

Members of the populist party supported public ownership of railroads because they thought it would?

Who was the politician that strongly supported popular sovereignty?

Would not be an issue supported by modern conservatives?

Which policy would be most likely be supported by the Democrats?

What was Samuel Adams' job in the American Revolution?