answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

"Money is speech"

User Avatar

Freda McKenzie

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Money is speech.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In Buckley v. Valeo, the Supreme Court said that _____ when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech.?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Tinker v. Des Moines?

it protected students' right to free expression at school


What was the US Supreme Court case Buckley v. Valeo?

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 US 1 (1976)In a Per curiam decision regarding recent legislative amendments to the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, the Court voted 7-1 in favor of Buckley, and upheld part of the legislation as constitutional, while striking down another part as unconstitutional.The amendments sought to reduce corruption in elections by placing a $1,000 limit on individual campaign contributions, forcing disclosure of political contributions above a certain threshold, and instituting a public finance option candidates could choose in place of accepting private contributions. The Court held that these restrictions were constitutional and served a valid government interest.Unlike contributions, however, the Court ruled limiting campaign expenditures did nothing to reduce the potential for corruption, and therefore did not serve a significant government interest.In an unrelated part of the legislation, the Supreme Court held that a complex amendment to the process for appointing members to the Federal Election Commission represented an unconstitutional breach of separation of powers, because the method employed allowed the House and Senate to appoint two members each, in violation of Article II of the Constitution (which deals with Presidential power). The right to appoint officers to service of the United States is reserved exclusively for the President, and Congress could confer no powers on the members it selected.Chief Justice Warren Burger proffered the only no vote; Justice Stevens did not participate on the case; some of the other justices expressed some ambivalence by issuing separate opinions concurring in part and dissenting in part, with little agreement over which parts were problematic.


What was the courts decision on the Colorado republican federal campaign committee and Douglas Jones treasurer petitioners v federal election commission?

Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee And Douglas Jones, Treasurer v. Federal Election Commission was a 1996 Supreme Court case dealing with campaign finance. The Court vacated the judgment of the lower court and remanded it, sending it back for further review and consideration of additional evidence.


What is the highest court in the United states-?

The correct name is the Supreme Court of the United States, but most people refer to it as the US Supreme Court. Each state has its own Supreme Court, but the US Supreme Court is the end of the line.


Which has the greater authority U.S Supreme Court or the state Supreme Court?

U.S Supreme Court

Related questions

In Buckley v. Valeo the Supreme Court said that when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech?

"Money is speech"


In Buckley versus Valeo the Supreme Court said that when it ruled that campaign spending is an expression of free speech?

"Money is speech"


Why have corporations and unions been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010?

the supreme court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech


The 1976 Supreme Court decision in the case of Buckley v. Valeo stated that candidates for public office?

Answer this question… could spend unlimited amounts of their own personal money on their campaign.


Which 1976 Supreme Court decision created the soft money loophole through which political parties could raise unlimited funds at the state level?

The 1976 Supreme Court decision that created the soft money loophole was Buckley v. Valeo. In this case, the Court held that government restrictions on campaign contributions and expenditures were constitutional, but it also ruled that regulations on spending by political parties violated the First Amendment. This ruling opened the door for parties to raise unlimited funds at the state level, leading to the rise of soft money in political campaigns.


How did the federal election campaign act reform campaign contributions?

The Federal Election Campaign Act added more transparency to political donations. The first amendment of the bill allowed for unlimited spending on activities such as voter turnout. However, a 2007 Supreme Court ruling struck down a ban on union and corporate independent spending that violated the Taft Hartley Act of 1947.


How did the supreme court ruling in citizens united v FEC affect campaign funding and spending?

it weakened campaign finance laws by ruling that corporations and unions could not be prohibited from running ads, and that corporations could spend an unlimited amount on federal elections


What do you understand by the expression supreme sacrifice?

"Supreme" in this context means "big". It might be (for example) somebody sacrificing his life, or that of his family, for something more important.


When did the supreme court rule that the federal government could attach spending conditions to the federal grants?

1987


Who is doing the modeling campaign for topshop?

Kiki Kang (New York) & Amanda Norgaard (Supreme) are two of the current models that appear in the Topshop Spring 2010 ad campaign.


What can stop gene expression?

Gene expression can be stopped by transcription factors binding to the promoter region of a gene, thus preventing RNA polymerase from transcribing the gene. Additionally, epigenetic modifications like DNA methylation and histone deacetylation can inhibit gene expression by altering chromatin structure and making the gene inaccessible for transcription. Other factors such as microRNAs can also interfere with gene expression by degrading mRNA molecules or blocking their translation into proteins.


Clinton v City of New York the Supreme Court reduced the presidents power over what?

federal spending