answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

In the Webster-Hayne debate Robert Y Hayne argued that?

http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!


Who argued in the Webster Hayne Debate?

The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.


Where was Daniel Webster position of nullification?

Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.


What US senator defended the Constitution and the union in a debate in 1830?

Daniel Webster


Who challenged Robert Hayne in a senate debate on states' rights?

Daniel Webster


What two men were in the great debate?

Daniel Webster and Henry Clay were the two men involved in the "Great Debate."


The 1830 debate between Senators Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne focused on?

slavery


What did Senators Robert Haynes of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in Congress in the Webster-Haynes debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 centered on the subject of presidential veto power state nullification of federal laws reform of the scandalous spoils system the morality of slavery?

The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 focused on the issue of state nullification of federal laws. Daniel Webster argued against the idea, emphasizing the supremacy of the federal government and the importance of maintaining a strong union. Robert Hayne, on the other hand, supported nullification as a means for states to protect their interests and limit federal power.


What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts in congress in the Webster hayne debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


The three elderly men who led the debate over California's admission were?

Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster - stella