In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
Daniel Webster
slavery
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!
The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster
Daniel Webster and Henry Clay were the two men involved in the "Great Debate."
slavery
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 focused on the issue of state nullification of federal laws. Daniel Webster argued against the idea, emphasizing the supremacy of the federal government and the importance of maintaining a strong union. Robert Hayne, on the other hand, supported nullification as a means for states to protect their interests and limit federal power.
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧
Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster - stella