answersLogoWhite

0

In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

In the Webster-Hayne debate Robert Y Hayne argued that?

http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!


Who argued in the Webster Hayne Debate?

The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.


Where was Daniel Webster position of nullification?

Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.


Who challenged Robert Hayne in a senate debate on states' rights?

Daniel Webster


What US senator defended the Constitution and the union in a debate in 1830?

Daniel Webster


What two men were in the great debate?

Daniel Webster and Henry Clay were the two men involved in the "Great Debate."


The 1830 debate between Senators Daniel Webster and Robert Hayne focused on?

slavery


What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in Congress in the Webster hang debate in 1830?

In the Webster-Hayne debate of 1830, Senators Robert Hayne and Daniel Webster engaged in a heated discussion primarily centered around states' rights versus federal authority. Hayne argued for the rights of states to nullify federal laws and emphasized the importance of state sovereignty, while Webster defended the supremacy of the federal government and the Union. The debate highlighted the growing sectional tensions in the U.S. and set the stage for future conflicts over states' rights and federal power. Ultimately, Webster's eloquent defense of the Union and national unity resonated strongly, shaping public opinion at the time.


What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


What did Senators Robert Haynes of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in Congress in the Webster-Haynes debate in 1830?

whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ*:・゚✧


The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 centered on the subject of presidential veto power state nullification of federal laws reform of the scandalous spoils system the morality of slavery?

The Webster-Hayne debate of 1830 focused on the issue of state nullification of federal laws. Daniel Webster argued against the idea, emphasizing the supremacy of the federal government and the importance of maintaining a strong union. Robert Hayne, on the other hand, supported nullification as a means for states to protect their interests and limit federal power.


What was the issue in the Webster Haynes debate?

The Webster-Hayne debate, occurring in 1830, primarily revolved around the issues of states' rights versus federal authority, especially in the context of the protection of individual liberties and the expansion of the nation. Daniel Webster argued for a strong federal government to preserve the Union and prevent disunion, while Robert Hayne defended the rights of states to nullify federal laws and promote regional interests, particularly concerning westward expansion and the influence of the South. This debate highlighted the growing tensions over sectionalism and foreshadowed the conflicts that would later lead to the Civil War.