answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Because people do things such as splitting their tickets. This means that they support a president from one party and members of Congress from the other. So, in street terms they flip flop their votes. This basically means for example that a democrat follower feels no sense of loyalty to the party. If I do not like you, I am not afraid to switch to republican.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

They can't be that weak because almost all candidates that get elected are either Republican or Democrat.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The American political parties are weak because they are polar opposites and break each other down. America is one of the few countries without a viable third party.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: In what ways are the American political parties weak?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

True or false A coalition of political parties can be strong or weak?

It is true that a coalition of political parties can be either strong or weak. It is more the actions that they take that are considered over their promising stance.


Are American political parties highly centralized or highly decentralized?

Political parties in the U.S. are highly decentralized and "weak" (according to most political scientists). This is likely because of the primary system combined with a first-past-the-post electoral system, in which voters from individual districts choose the nominee for each party. This allows voters to choose who most reflect their values (like pro-gun, anti-abortion Democrats in the South). In the UK, where the parties are much stronger and more centralized, the leadership of the parties choose the nominees for each district -- the voters get no say. This lends itself to party members falling in line with the wants of the party leaders much more. John McCain and Arlen Specter are basically impossible in the UK.


This type of political party supported a strong central government?

While it was not a political party in the idea of political parties today, those who opposed the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans (first political party) favored a strong federal (national) government and weak state governments. They took the name "Federalists" as that was the name given to the people who had supported ratification of the U.S. Constitution.


What difference between a strong central government and a weak central government led to which political parties being formed?

a strong government has the power to make laws for the whole country and this political system is adopted by the United States,however a weak government has no the power to make laws or even to decide for the whole country this polictical system was adopted by the united states before writing the constitution.


What contributions do minor parties make to the US political system?

Minor parties take votes away from the candidates of other parties.

Related questions

Can A coalition of political parties can be strong or weak?

true.


True or false A coalition of political parties can be strong or weak?

It is true that a coalition of political parties can be either strong or weak. It is more the actions that they take that are considered over their promising stance.


A coalition of political parties can be strong or weak true or false?

true


A coalition of political parties can be strong or weak.?

coalition of political parties are always weak as people of different ideologies work there. Many a time the main party has to compromise just because for the benefit of some other smaller allies ,which halters the development.Moreover the allies themselves keep on fighting to retain their position in the government.


Are American political parties highly centralized or highly decentralized?

Political parties in the U.S. are highly decentralized and "weak" (according to most political scientists). This is likely because of the primary system combined with a first-past-the-post electoral system, in which voters from individual districts choose the nominee for each party. This allows voters to choose who most reflect their values (like pro-gun, anti-abortion Democrats in the South). In the UK, where the parties are much stronger and more centralized, the leadership of the parties choose the nominees for each district -- the voters get no say. This lends itself to party members falling in line with the wants of the party leaders much more. John McCain and Arlen Specter are basically impossible in the UK.


Hamid Karzai's political party?

Politcal Parties are weak in Afghanistan due to the Single Non-Transferable Vote electoral system. This system favors independent candidates. Karzai ran as an independent candidate.


This type of political party supported a strong central government?

While it was not a political party in the idea of political parties today, those who opposed the Jeffersonian Democratic-Republicans (first political party) favored a strong federal (national) government and weak state governments. They took the name "Federalists" as that was the name given to the people who had supported ratification of the U.S. Constitution.


What difference between a strong central government and a weak central government led to which political parties being formed?

a strong government has the power to make laws for the whole country and this political system is adopted by the United States,however a weak government has no the power to make laws or even to decide for the whole country this polictical system was adopted by the united states before writing the constitution.


What contributions do minor parties make to the US political system?

Minor parties take votes away from the candidates of other parties.


What are the effects of having weaker parties?

Having weaker parties can lead to less accountability and oversight of government actions, as there are fewer checks and balances in place. It can also result in reduced representation of diverse viewpoints and interests in the political system. Weaker parties may struggle to effectively advocate for their constituents and push through meaningful policy changes.


Why was Andrew Jackson a weak president?

Andrew Jackson was a bad president because he was corrupt; he used mudslinging to win his elections and forced indians out of the eastern united States. He didn't have the support of any parties anyways. In the election, he randomly decided to switch parties, and so both parties disliked him. One because he had switched OUT of their party, and the other because he never really agreed wanted to be in their party, he just did so for political reasons.


What factor will most likely improve economic growth in weak rule-of-law countries. captilism or political reform?

Political Reform