0
In what ways did the framers claim to have already tried in addressing the complaint?
because they were declared war!
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Professor
Coach
BeauAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What ways did the framers claim to have attemped addressing their complaints before the declaration of independence?
I think that you are asking how they delivered the complaint? The original document was sent to King George III of the United Kingdom in 1776 by sea, but he was very mad and destroyed the paper. The copy that was made in the same year is kept in Washington D.C. in an underground chamber. It is a historical document that changed the world, after all, if not just a copy.
Why does writing a qualified claim make your claim stronger?
Because it acknowledges that your claim is debatable
In this passage from Compulsory Voting AnIn Compulsory Voting An Idea Whose Time Has Come what reason do opponents of compulsory vo Idea Whose Time Has Come what claim is being made by the author?
U.S. citizens already have compulsory obligations to their country
What causes implied powers?
To the framers of the constitution there were two types of powers. Expressed power and implied. The expressed powers are ones that are stated like the power to declare war is given to congress, but to the framers it was clear that they didn't mean to have these powers be the final word so they built in a " fail safe" method to give leeway in what congress can do. They used a clause in Article 1 stating what was " necessary and proper." This means that congress can make laws to carry out the expressed powers. To a strict constructionist this is hazy and they are fearful that the government might take on too many powers and they claim that the constitution limits congress to powers only expressed in the constitution. A loose constructionist feel that congress not only has the power but the responsibility to adapt to changing times by making new laws. The existence of the clause in Article 1 indicates that the Framers knew the government would change and have to take on additional powers or obligations. The Supreme Court brought the concept of implied powers to life by hearing cases like aMcCulloch v Maryland in 1819.
What powers are not in the constitution but are implied?
To the framers of the constitution there were two types of powers. Expressed power and implied. The expressed powers are ones that are stated like the power to declare war is given to congress, but to the framers it was clear that they didn't mean to have these powers be the final word so they built in a " fail safe" method to give leeway in what congress can do. They used a clause in Article 1 stating what was " necessary and proper." This means that congress can make laws to carry out the expressed powers. To a strict constructionist this is hazy and they are fearful that the government might take on too many powers and they claim that the constitution limits congress to powers only expressed in the constitution. A loose constructionist feel that congress not only has the power but the responsibility to adapt to changing times by making new laws. The existence of the clause in Article 1 indicates that the Framers knew the government would change and have to take on additional powers or obligations. The Supreme Court brought the concept of implied powers to life by hearing cases like aMcCulloch v Maryland in 1819.
