Quite awkward.
Chat with our AI personalities
narrow interpretation is the in between interpretation of the judges of the supreme court. In a narrow interpretation the judges fallow what is on the constitution but also their ideas.
In a strict interpretation, everything is taken literally and nothing is implied or assumed.
Alexander Hamilton believed in a loose interpretation, while Thomas Jefferson believed in a strict interpretation.
An interpretation An interpreter
A broad interpretation of the Constitution would be one that allows a considerable amount of flexibility. A narrow interpretation would tend to interpret the laws in the most literal sense. Anti-Federalists like Thomas Jefferson favored a strict interpretation, and were against loose interpretation because it meant stepping outside the boundaries, and assuming more power than had been granted. The Federalists, on the other hand, favored a more ambiguous interpretation that would allow to the government to assume additional power when needed.