0
Is Considering the historians use of source material which interpretation is most valid?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
A historian cites a series of secret Cartoons drawn while Germany occupied France during World War II in order to draw conclusions about an underground resistance movement.
(APEX)
!/
Justine Wiegand
Cookiies4U
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
As one form of historical source secondary sources are based on?
Interpretation.
In the finding evaluating and interpreting source material stage of the research process interpreting means?
thinking about how the source material applies to your question.
What step must a historian take to evaluate historical evidence?
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
Why do historians not find livy a reliable source of information?
They do find reliable sources. Without that their work is invalid and wrong.
What is the most commonly used source of geographical material?
The encyclopedia
What strategy do historians use to synthesize evidence and draw a conclusion?
Historians use evidence from various sources, such as primary documents, artifacts, and secondary sources, to analyze and interpret events. They critically evaluate the credibility and bias of each source before synthesizing the information to form a conclusion. The process involves identifying patterns, making connections, and considering different perspectives to arrive at a well-supported interpretation.
What is the most likely intent of the director's interpretation?
The most likely intent of the director's interpretation is to convey a specific vision or message to the audience, bring out the themes and emotions of the story, and create a unique artistic interpretation of the source material.
How do historians analyze evidence?
Historians analyze evidence by examining its reliability, relevance, and context. They assess the source of the evidence, its bias, and corroborating or contradictory evidence to form a well-supported interpretation of the past. Additionally, historians use critical thinking skills to evaluate the perspectives and motives of the sources providing the evidence.
In the finding evaluating and interpreting source material stage of the research process of evaluating means?
evaluating means determining the credibility, relevance, and quality of the source material. This involves considering factors such as the author's expertise, bias, publication date, and methodology to assess whether the source is reliable and suitable for the research purpose.
What is written source?
It is an interpretation
What is the name for skill s that historians apply to analyze evidence in order to make meaning of the past?
Historical skills, such as critical thinking, source analysis, and interpretation, are applied by historians to analyze evidence and make sense of the past. By examining primary sources, questioning biases, and evaluating context, historians can construct informed narratives about historical events.
What does snythesizing a research essay mean?
It means gathering information from several different sources and drawing conclusions about what the facts are based on your interpretation of the different source material.
How can a person be cosidered a primary source?
A person can be considered a primary source if they directly experienced or witnessed an event they are describing, providing firsthand accounts or original data without interpretation or analysis. Primary sources are valuable for historians and researchers seeking unfiltered information from the time of the event.
Who was the first great writers of tragedy whose plays survived?
historians relying on the same source material provide vastly different pictures of alexander the great in their assesdments of his life and legacy
How do historians support they're conclusions?
Historians support their conclusions by conducting thorough research, analyzing various historical sources, evaluating the reliability of each source, considering differing perspectives, and presenting their findings backed up with evidence. They also engage with the existing scholarship in the field to build upon or challenge established interpretations.
How historian using the thinking skill of primary source analysis might?
Historians analyze primary sources by evaluating their credibility, context, and purpose to draw conclusions about the past. They examine the source's biases, author's perspective, and possible motivations to understand the historical events more accurately. By critically assessing primary sources, historians can reconstruct the past more effectively and provide a more nuanced interpretation of historical events.
Why is a culture oarl tradition an important source for historians?
cookies
