Best Answer

Yes, they are considered to be primary sources. Perhaps one of the best examples of this is the Bayeux tapestry which depicts the Norman conquest of England. Tapestries are not to be underestimated as source material as despite their pictorial format they provide information about the sort of views that were contemporary with the historical event you're looking into. For example, within the Bayeux tapestry you will find King Harold as being referred to as "Rex" which is the Latin for King. However, by the end of the 11th century Norman sources do not actually refer to him as a King. In this sense you can see how chroniclers are presentinghistory to fit the views of the Norman house.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago


This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Is a medieval tapestry a primary source?
Write your answer...
Still have questions?
magnify glass
Related questions

Would you consider the Bayeux Tapestry a primary source or a secondary source?

Are you talking about the tapestry itself as a textile, or are you talking about information portrayed on the tapestry?

What is midieval tapestry?

An example of a medieval tapestry is the Bayeux tapestry, which was all about the battle of hastings

Is a medieval painting showing village life a primary or secondary source?


What was the bayeux tapestry what does it show us what kind of source is it?

the bayeux tapestry is a giant picture of 1066 pictures of 1000-1090 primary source it is

What is a medieval curtain wall?

A tapestry?

What has the author Dora Heinz written?

Dora Heinz has written: 'Linzer Teppiche' -- subject(s): Austrian Rugs, Rugs, Austrian 'Medieval tapestries' -- subject(s): Medieval Tapestry, Tapestry, Medieval

Can you help you identify the internet meme with the old tapestry and medieval translations of internet phrases?

The bayeux tapestry is the one. It's based on the bayeux tapestry.

Is the Bayeux Tapestry realistic?

The Bayeux Tapestry tells a medieval story, scene by scene, so yes, you could say it is realistic.

Why is the bayeux tapestry a good source of primary evidence?

The Bayeux Tapestry is a useful primary resource because it was made by people who were around at the time, which is what makes it primary. It is useful because it is one of few pieces of evidence used to represent what happened.

How important is The Bayeux Tapestry to a historian studying the Norman conquest?

The Bayeux Tapestry is important since most paintings during the Medieval Ages consisted of Christian Art. The Bayeux Tapestry was one of the few found to have contained the daily life of peasants, kings and so on. This showed many researchers what life was like in the Medieval Ages. So basically it "opened" our eyes to the Medieval world

Why is the bayeux tapestry an important source?

it provides a history of the Battle of Hastings one of the primary events in English history. It also shows the skills of Middle Ages art and weaving.

What is one possible of using the tapestry as a historical source?

A tapestry could be used as a primary source. The fabric used and the theme can tell historians a lot, but not the entire story. Example is the Unicorn Tapestries are among the most beautiful and complex works of art from the late Middle Ages. There is a lot of symbolism in the work and yet historians have to guess at meanings and who made it. To understand sources historians have to understand what happened in history the Bayeux tapestry does exactly that .