Britain
Elastic clause
yes. 1901 Constitution1934 Constitution1940 Constitution1976 Constitution
A country needs a constitution as a basis for legislation because without one, politicians can take a country completely away from its initial objectives into the product of the greed of a few corrupted individuals.
England
rigid constitution are those constitution that can not be changed why FLEXIBLE constitution are constitution that can be changed through a process of amendment
rigid
they are: written constitution, unwritten constitution, flexible constitution and rigid constitution.
A constitution of any nation must be a rigid framework for government. Without it anyone with a hair brain idea can change it. The amendment process makes sure things can change, but they have to be discussed, analyzed, voted on, and finally added. This is why there are only 26 amendments in the constitution today. I can not imagine what the most recent Congress would add to the constitution without the rigid process.
because
constitution of any country (not only nepal) is the basic code and how the country is governed and what it stands for
Bangladesh Constitution is rigid whereas the UK Constitution is flexible. Ad Rashed ali
Nigeria operates a written constitution nd its (constitution) its a rigid one becouse it can nt easily be amended
written and unwritten, codified and uncodified flexible and rigid
Well, it's partly rigid because it's the longest modern constitution...and it's partly flexible because there have been 107 amendments since its promulgation.
Its the shortest of any major gouvernement with less than 5000 words.
if there is no written constitution any one can rebel and bittery . any individual country can be formed. thereia no right to speech and freedom.