Compromising is still important to leaders because know what to do with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Popular sovereignty is the concept that people rule. Limited government is when government has limited power. Republicanism- im still trying to find that one sorry. =(
does the maya government still exist today yes or no
Most countries where Communism is the dominant belief system discourage any organized religion. They want Communism to be the official ideology and no other belief system is welcomed by the government. (This is based on the fact that Karl Marx was very negative about religion.) But Communist governments have not been successful in totally eradicating religion; they have just pushed it from the public sphere into the private sphere. For example, in Russia, Cuba, and Poland, religion was either entirely banned or at least discouraged by the Communist government. People in those countries lived an outwardly secular life, as their leaders wanted. But the culture still reflected the influence of the what had been the dominant churches: Russian Orthodox church (in Russia) or the Catholic church (in Poland and Cuba). Eventually, after the Communist leaders lost power in Russia and Poland, church attendance resumed. And in Cuba, which is still a Communist government, the leaders (Fidel Castro and his brother Raul) gradually relented to allow some outward practice of Catholicism. But obedience to the Communist government is still supposed to come first.
The constitution is that foundation for the government.
still rejecting calls for reform
Yes, when religious leaders run a government it is a theocracy. Many countries today are still theocratic.
Their laws are still used today.
Although some were killed in reprisals, and others fled the country to hide, some former Khmer Rouge leaders are still powerful leaders in the current government.
China is still under communist rule. Most leaders in this government are from the older generation and the military the PLA are used to enforce the governments decisions.
It's system of government. If a country is still developing they will have a direct democracy or communism, depending on its leaders.
Although some were killed in reprisals, and others fled the country to hide, some former Khmer Rouge leaders are still powerful leaders in the current government.
There use to be none, but in 1980 there was a reform that created a weak rule of law. This rule of law was only kinda followed but still better then before
No. The leaders of Iraq are actually elected - although the elections are still somewhat flawed. Dictators stay in power as long as they want - or until they get assassinated or are removed by a coup d'état. The current government of Iraq is still subject to removal if they lose an election.
Alexander Hamilton was our first Secretary of the Treasury, and he was the one that set up the structure and function of that portion of our government such as the cabinet and the Mint, which are still both essential in government.
Rome's laws proved a model for many of today's nations.
Popular sovereignty is the concept that people rule. Limited government is when government has limited power. Republicanism- im still trying to find that one sorry. =(
Some of the fears of the political leaders in France was that the leaders of state wanted copmlete control over the people. The leaders knew that their people they ruled didn't like them so they lived in fear. The fear of being over taken by the people of there state, so that anybody trying to change the government would be killed. Some people wouldn't really be talking bad about there government and still get killed, or sent of to labor camps. People didn't have any freedom's they would live in constant fear of the powerful leaders that would kill them for the littlest thing that they would do wrong.