No, because it has nothing to do with the relative power and jurisdiction between state and federal government. The Senate approving a presidential appointment is an example of the system of "checks and balances" in our federal government. Requiring Senate approval of presidential appointments, prevents the executive branch of government from having too much power over who shall be judges, ambassadors and other federal officials.
Elena Kagan - Appointed by president Obama.
One example of the Judicial Branch checking the Legislative Branch would be the Supreme Court declaring a law unconstitutional and overturning the legislation.
It is whatever you make it out to be
Civil War of 1861-1865.
Federalism is an ideology based on how much power the federal (national) level of government should have. There are two main schools of thought. One is dual federalism (also known as layer cake federalism). Under dual federalizm, state and national government both have their own set of powers and should not interfere with each other's business. The other, cooperative federalism (or marble cake federalism), is based on the idea that both levels of government should work together. Take for example the New Deal.
Approving the choice of justices
Approving the choice of justices
no
The appointment of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court. -NovaNET
Elena Kagan - Appointed by president Obama.
The appointment of Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court. -NovaNET
unitary is the antonym; this is where supreme power of a state all rests in one body for example Westminster in the UK.
North Korea is a non-example of Federalism because the central government control everything.
One example of Federalism is wheen you go to the bathroom and take a crap. Thats federalism
One example of the Judicial Branch checking the Legislative Branch would be the Supreme Court declaring a law unconstitutional and overturning the legislation.
this is federalism. people who post need to spell CORRECTLY!
It is whatever you make it out to be