answersLogoWhite

0

Techinically, no.

Federalism deals with the vertical structuring of power within the US government. Non-delegation doctrine is rooted in the Separation of Powers (5th grade civics on checks & balances). Separation of Powers and Federalism issues are often confused because Sep of Powers deals with horizontal separation of powers (i.e., what authority the legislature has that the executive or judicial do not) where Federalism deals with the vertical separation of powers (i.e., whether the Fed has the constitutional authority over a matter or if it is something that is purely a state issue).

The non-delegation doctrine basically holds that the executive branch cannot perform legislative functions but there's a lot of grey area there... if you look at the Treasury Dept or the SEC (securities and exchange commission), for example, they both perform quasi-legislative functions but are part of the executive branch. The basic reason why these two executive agencies (and many more!) do not violate the non-delegation doctrine is due to the degree of oversight that Congress has over them and the role Congress plays in appointments and removals of key personnel within these organizations.

I hope that answers your question.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about American Government

What was the notion that people should be able to vote on the matter of slavery in the territories called?

The notion that people should be able to vote on the matter of slavery in the territories was called popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty is a doctrine rooted in the belief that every human being is sovereign.


In which school of jurisprudence is the concept of stare decisis rooted?

The Historical school


Althought not mentioned in the constitution this item is rooted in our legal heritage?

Presumption of innocence


Which leaders objected to paying the states debts?

Leaders such as Thomas Jefferson and James Madison objected to paying the states' debts after the American Revolutionary War. They believed that the federal government should not assume the debts incurred by individual states, viewing it as unfair to those states that had already paid off their debts. Their opposition was rooted in concerns about federal power and the potential for a centralized government to impose undue control over the states. This disagreement contributed to the broader debates over federalism and the balance of power in the early United States.


What is the definition of papal authority?

Papal authority refers to the spiritual and administrative power held by the Pope, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church. It encompasses the Pope's role in guiding doctrine, making moral decisions, and exercising governance over church matters. This authority is rooted in the belief that the Pope is the successor of Saint Peter, who was appointed by Jesus as the head of his apostles. As such, the Pope is considered the supreme earthly authority on issues of faith and morals within the Catholic Church.

Related Questions

The Truman doctrine was rooted in the idea of what?

The foreign policy of the Truman administration manifested by the policy of his name was rooted in containing Soviet aggression and expansion. Flashpoints of the Truman Doctrine were in attempts of Soviet subversion of Turkey and Greece after the War.


Why were Calhouns reason for proposing the doctrine of nullification?

John C. Calhoun proposed the doctrine of nullification as a response to what he viewed as the oppressive economic policies imposed by the federal government, particularly tariffs that disproportionately affected Southern states. He argued that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, believing this would protect their sovereignty and interests. Calhoun feared that unchecked federal power could threaten the institution of slavery and the way of life in the South. Ultimately, his doctrine was rooted in a defense of states' rights and a reaction against perceived federal overreach.


What is sin against reason?

Sin against reason is a tent of believers in philosophia doctrine and has nothing to do with Sin as defined in Christian doctrine (sin against our Fathers law as given to Moses and proclaimed by his prophets as well as Christ and his apostles). Sin against reason is based in the use of dialectics by believers in philosophia doctrine, usually Stoic Philosophia doctrine. Believers base their belief of truth to be rooted in the logic and reason of dialectics.


Characteristic of a paradigm?

based on a persons lifelong experience or mental models generally accepted by the group or often rooted in doctrine, tradition and ideologies or used by an individual to solve problems


What is the difference between Nigerian and American federalism?

Nigerian federalism is characterized by a more centralized system, where the federal government holds significant power, often leading to tensions with state governments over authority and resources. In contrast, American federalism emphasizes a clear division of powers between the federal and state governments, with both having constitutionally defined roles. Additionally, Nigeria's federal system is influenced by ethnic and regional divisions, which can complicate governance, while the U.S. federalism is more rooted in historical compromises and a broader political consensus.


When did the roosevelt corollary to the monroe doctrine stated?

The Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine was articulated by President Theodore Roosevelt in his State of the Union address on December 6, 1904. It expanded the original Monroe Doctrine, asserting that the United States had the right to intervene in Latin American countries to maintain stability and prevent European intervention. This policy was rooted in the belief that the U.S. should act as a regional police power in the Western Hemisphere.


What are deep-rooted and shallow rooted plants?

po


What is the radical expression of 3 square rooted 6 - 4 square rooted 6?

- square rooted by 6


The Truman Doctrine was rooted in the idea of?

The Truman Doctrine committed the United States to a foreign policy of foreign intervention. It authorized political, military and economic support to all countries under threat from internal or external authoritarian forces. This moved the United States from withdrawing from regional conflicts that did not affect this country to possible intervention in far off conflicts.


When was the mobile conveyance doctrine made law?

The mobile conveyance doctrine was established in the United States through the Supreme Court case California v. Carney in 1985. This legal principle allows law enforcement to conduct warrantless searches of vehicles without probable cause, based on the belief that vehicles are inherently mobile and may quickly leave the jurisdiction. The doctrine is rooted in the idea that the diminished expectation of privacy in vehicles justifies this exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement.


Why did the south create the doctrine of nullification?

The South created the doctrine of nullification as a response to perceived overreach by the federal government, particularly regarding tariffs that they believed disproportionately harmed their agrarian economy. Rooted in the belief that states had the right to nullify federal laws they deemed unconstitutional, this doctrine aimed to assert state sovereignty and protect regional interests. It reflected the growing tensions between Southern states and the federal government, ultimately contributing to the secessionist sentiments that led to the Civil War.


Can the seed from a mahogany tree be rooted?

It cannot be rooted but it can by sprouted.