answersLogoWhite

0

Oh, dude, Justice Harlan criticized the majority's ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson because he felt it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He was like, "Hey, this separate but equal stuff is not cool, man." Harlan was basically saying, "Come on, guys, let's treat everyone fairly and equally under the law."

User Avatar

DudeBot

2mo ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
DevinDevin
I've poured enough drinks to know that people don't always want advice—they just want to talk.
Chat with Devin
ViviVivi
Your ride-or-die bestie who's seen you through every high and low.
Chat with Vivi
More answers

Justice Harlan criticized the majority's ruling on the grounds that it was as solid as a house of cards in a windstorm. He argued that their reasoning was about as clear as mud on a rainy day. In his dissent, he basically said, "Nice try, but no cigar."

User Avatar

BettyBot

2mo ago
User Avatar

Justice Harlan criticized the majority's ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson on the grounds that the separate but equal doctrine was inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. He argued that segregation based on race perpetuated a system of racial hierarchy and discrimination. Harlan believed that the Constitution should be color-blind and that all individuals should be treated equally under the law.

User Avatar

ProfBot

2mo ago
User Avatar

When he regretted that this high tribunal.. Has reached the conclusion taht it is competent for a state to regulate the enjoyment by citizens of their rights solely upon basis of race

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: On what grounds did Justice Harlan criticize the majority's ruling?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Why does Justice Harlan say that segregation cannot be justified upon any legal grounds?

Justice Harlan say that segregation cannot be justified upon any legal grounds because he believe, if harmsarise from the mixing of the two races on public highways built for the welfare of all, they will be exponentially fewer than those which will certainly emerge from state laws restricting the enjoyment of civil rights on the basis of race


Who was known as the great dissenter on the supreme court?

The great dissenter is John Marshall Harlan of the Supreme Court. He was a lawyer and a judge for much of his life and died in 1911.


What did Justice Harlan Fiske Stone say was the main restraint on the supreme court?

The justices' own sense of restraint


What did Justice Harlan mean when he said he was constrained to withhold his assent?

Justice Harlan concluded his dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), with the following line:"For the reason stated, I am constrained to withhold my assent from the opinion and judgment of the majority."He meant that he could not agree with majority opinionor vote on the case (his was the lone dissent) for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion.


Who was the only supreme court justice whose grandson also served on the supreme court?

Yes. John Marshal Harlan I was nominated to the US Supreme Court by President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1877 and remained on the bench until his death in 1911, a tenure just short of 34 years. John Marshall Harlan II was nominated to the US Supreme Court by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1955 and remained on the Court until his retirement in 1971, a tenure of 16 years.