Being refused a lawyer by the state of Florida..... apex... makes no sense to me but its right apparently
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)
Clarence Earl Gideon is the dude in Florida who was accused of breaking and entering in 1961 who was deinied an attorney. After 2 years in prison, he appealed to the supreme court and the supreme court reversed Betts vs. Brady, and Gideon is the reason why we have a public defender system...
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)
Clarence Earl Gideon served two years of a five year sentence for the original 1961 conviction of "breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny," a felony in the state of Florida.
If five years was the maximum penalty for his crime under Florida's sentencing guidelines at that time, he probably received a longer sentence due to being a habitual criminal. Gideon had spent most of the previous three decades in and out of Texas and Missouri state prisons on charges of burglary, stealing, larceny, petty theft and escape. He had also been incarcerated in federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for stealing unspecified government property.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Gideon vs. Wainwright is a US Supreme Court Case from 1963. The vote was unanimous. This court case decided under the fourth amendment, state courts are required to provide an attorney in criminal cases when the defendant cannot afford one.
Those who cannot hire a lawyer shall have counsel provided for them.
Justice Clarence Thomas was the 106th justice to sit on the US Supreme Court.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)Clarence Earl Gideon served two years of a five year sentence for the original 1961 conviction of "breaking and entering with intent to commit petty larceny," a felony in the state of Florida. Gideon entered prison in August 1961 and was released in August 1963 after the US Supreme Court remanded the case for rehearing. The second jury deliberated only an hour before acquitting Gideon in his second trial.Gideon was a petty criminal who had spent most of the previous three decades in and out of Texas and Missouri state prisons on charges of burglary, stealing, larceny, petty theft and escape. He had also been incarcerated in federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, for stealing unspecified government property.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Clarence Earl Gideon was born 1910, and was 52 years old when the US Supreme Court released its decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 355 (1963). He turned 53 years old in August of that year.
Clarence E.Gideon is the appellant (as this was a Supreme Court appeal) and Louie L. Wainright is the defendant (representing the Secretary of the Florida Dept. of Corrections).
The right to a lawyer.
Gideon v Wainwright
Gideon was acquitted at his second trial.In Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963), the US Supreme Court vacated the judgment in Clarence Earl Gideon's original trial and remanded he case for a new trial. Gideon was represented by attorney W. Fred Turner at his second trial, State of Florida v. Clarence Earl Gideon, and was acquitted after a brief jury deliberation.
The Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) ensured indigent criminal defendants had access to a court-appoint attorney.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
In Gideon's first trial, State of Florida v. Clarence Earl Gideon, he was forced to defend himself (pro se) because the Supreme Court ruled in Betts v. Brady, (1942) that the states didn't have to provide court-appointed counsel to indigent criminal defendants. The Supreme Court overturned this decision in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963).Gideon's attorney in the Supreme Court case was future justice Abe Fortas; his attorney at his second trial was Fred W. Turner.
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963)The case was originally called Gideon v. Cochran, but Louie L. Wainwright succeeded Cochran as Secretary to the Florida Department of Corrections before the case was heard in the US Supreme Court.
In Gideon v. Wainwright, the Supreme Court ruled that if a defendant cannot afford a lawyer, one must be provided to him or her regardless of the defendant's ability to pay or the importance of the charges.
Gideon was the man denied the aid of an attorney at his trial, He sued, seeking the right to be provided with an attorney. The Supreme Court decided in his favor. Gideon won, Wainwright lost.