answersLogoWhite

0

This excerpt is an example of a dissenting opinion. In the context of Supreme Court decisions, a dissenting opinion is written by a justice (or justices) who disagree with the majority opinion. Dissenting opinions provide an alternative viewpoint and reasoning for why the decision should have been different.

User Avatar

ProfBot

2mo ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

TaigaTaiga
Every great hero faces trials, and you—yes, YOU—are no exception!
Chat with Taiga
CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
JudyJudy
Simplicity is my specialty.
Chat with Judy
More answers

Excuse me, did you by chance copy-paste this from a school-book?

User Avatar

Anonymous

3y ago
User Avatar
User Avatar

Darren Yarberry

Lvl 1
1y ago
Nah lil bro

Judicial Review

APEX

User Avatar

APEX User

Lvl 7
3y ago
User Avatar
User Avatar

Gia Porter

Lvl 1
1y ago
apex- a precedent

who know

User Avatar

LE'NYAH DINES

Lvl 5
3y ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Read this excerpt from the dissent on Tinker v. Des Moines:While the absence of obscene remarks...In terms of Supreme Court language and protocol, what is this excerpt an example ofA. A judicial reviewB. A majority opinionC. A precedentD. A summary?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

In terms of supreme court language and protocol what is this excerpt an example of?

A Judicial Review.


Do you think an advocate of judicial restraint would support a narrow interpretation of the constitution or a broad interpretation?

An advocate of judicial restrain would support a narrow interpretation of the Constitution, one that adhered closely to the language of the document and his or her belief about the Framers' original intent. Interpretive ideologies such as textualism, "strict constructionism," and originalism are most often associated with judicial restraint. Contextualism, which attempts to infer intent from content, may also result in judicial restraint; however, the degree of subjectivity implicit in this method can also lend itself to judicial activism.


What was the effect of the US Supreme Court case Marbury v Madison?

The most important effect of Marbury v. Madison, (1803), is that it affirmed the Supreme Court's right of judicial review and set a precedent for future cases. Judicial review is the power of the Court to evaluate laws relevant to cases before the court to determine their constitutionality, and to nullify (overturn) any they find unconstitutional.In Marbury, the Supreme Court decided Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional because Congress had overreached its authority by granting the Court the right to issue all writs of mandamus, which contradicted the language of Article III of the Constitution.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)


How do you say My country in Egypt language?

There is no "Egypt" language, the language spoken in Egypt is Arabic.


Official language of United States?

There is no official language in the United States; English is the de facto language.