0
Whether guns should be banned is a matter of opinion. That said, however, there is no legitimate reason to believe that banning guns will stop crime or violence. The human race was violent LONG before guns existed, and people that think banning guns will stop the world's violence are living in a dream world.
There is no good reason to believe that banning firearms will reduce crime and violence. Those who believe that banning firearms will end violence in the world live under the illusion that humanity was violent before guns existed.
Gun control doesn't help because most people use guns to take lives, not save them. Banning guns wouldn't change anything, criminals would still have access to firearms, and people would be at the mercy of all criminals.
Whether or not guns should be banned depends on who you ask. But there is no good reason to believe that banning guns will reduce crime and violence. Humanity has been violent long before guns existed, so those who believe gun bans will end global violence live in a fantasy world.
Depending on who you ask, you may or may not need to ban guns. However, there is no solid evidence that gun bans reduce crime and violence. Violence was part of humanity before guns existed, so those who believe that banning guns can stop violence in the world live in fiction.
Depending on who you ask, you may or may not need gun control. However, there is no conclusive evidence that gun control reduces crime and violence. Violence has always been part of human nature, so those who believe that banning firearms will make the world bloodless live in fiction.
Absolutely not. If there were no guns where would we be now? The British would still be in control. And if the government abuses it's power, how do we protest?
Definitely not. Where would we be today if there were no firearms? The British would remain in charge. How can we protest if the government oversteps its bounds?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What would the Second Amendment would most likely prevent the federal government from passing what law?
any answer that says anything about guns being banned
Should the government take away your guns?
No they shouldn't be aloud to take away are guns. But they should make sure that you are all there in the head before giving anyone a gun. But that won't get rid of gun violence, because people buying guns legally aren't the problem, for the most part.
Which statement supporting restrictions on guns is most clearly based on the language of the Second Amendment?
only people who are members of a militia should be able to own guns
What was the belief that voters should be given the right to decide if slavery would be permitted or banned?
popular sovereignty
Which amendment banned slavery?
13th
Should guns be banned in the US?
Guns should be banned because they encourage people to have long hardcore sex
Why should guns be banned from the streets?
Legal ownership is not the problem.
Are cap guns banned from Canada?
No, cap guns are not banned from Canada.
Should all guns be banned?
Some people believe that all guns should be banned, or at least registered, except for military, police, and perhaps sporting use.Some people believe that all guns should be permitted, and none registered.Many take positions between those extremes.one view opposed to banningNo. When guns are banned, the only people with guns are criminals. If you want to cut down on crime, make it easier for everyone to carry concealed. It will cut back on court costs and eliminate the costs to house criminals in prison.
Why should the US banned handguns?
The US should not ban hand guns. A tool is a tool. The user is the problem.
When were guns banned from airports?
I'm pretty sure that different airports banned guns at different times.
Will guns be banned in 2016?
No
Should gun control be band?
The act of attempting to restrict the access to guns is unconstitutional so it therefor should be banned.
How do you you get banned for getting golden guns MW2?
you have to hack it to get gold guns
Will violence go down if guns are banned?
No
Would cops be able to carry weapons if guns were banned?
If you take the example of the UK (where guns are banned), the normal police on duty on the streets are not armed with guns. There are UK police trained to use and carry guns but they only do so when responding to a situation where a criminal is seen to be armed. Based on this tried example, is is clear that if guns were banned effectively, the police would not need to carry weapons.
Why should handguns be banned?
They should be banned for two very good reasons, 1, to leave the public unable to defend themselves against gun wielding criminals (who get their guns illegally),and 2, they should also be banned to make gun crimes go up dramatically. Just like Austrailia, the UK, Mexico and Japan has done, they have banned the LEGAL sale of guns to their publics, and the gun crime as a result of that has gone up 40% in the last 2 years. Banning handguns is a very good idea for destroying your country!
