Whether guns should be banned is a matter of opinion. That said, however, there is no legitimate reason to believe that banning guns will stop crime or violence. The human race was violent LONG before guns existed, and people that think banning guns will stop the world's violence are living in a dream world.
There is no good reason to believe that banning firearms will reduce crime and violence. Those who believe that banning firearms will end violence in the world live under the illusion that humanity was violent before guns existed.
Gun control doesn't help because most people use guns to take lives, not save them. Banning guns wouldn't change anything, criminals would still have access to firearms, and people would be at the mercy of all criminals.
Whether or not guns should be banned depends on who you ask. But there is no good reason to believe that banning guns will reduce crime and violence. Humanity has been violent long before guns existed, so those who believe gun bans will end global violence live in a fantasy world.
Depending on who you ask, you may or may not need to ban guns. However, there is no solid evidence that gun bans reduce crime and violence. Violence was part of humanity before guns existed, so those who believe that banning guns can stop violence in the world live in fiction.
Depending on who you ask, you may or may not need gun control. However, there is no conclusive evidence that gun control reduces crime and violence. Violence has always been part of human nature, so those who believe that banning firearms will make the world bloodless live in fiction.
Absolutely not. If there were no guns where would we be now? The British would still be in control. And if the government abuses it's power, how do we protest?
Definitely not. Where would we be today if there were no firearms? The British would remain in charge. How can we protest if the government oversteps its bounds?
no
any answer that says anything about guns being banned
No they shouldn't be aloud to take away are guns. But they should make sure that you are all there in the head before giving anyone a gun. But that won't get rid of gun violence, because people buying guns legally aren't the problem, for the most part.
only people who are members of a militia should be able to own guns
popular sovereignty
13th
Guns should be banned because they encourage people to have long hardcore sex
Legal ownership is not the problem.
No, cap guns are not banned from Canada.
Should social media platforms regulate content for misinformation? Is genetically modified food safe for consumption? Should the death penalty be abolished? Is climate change primarily caused by human activity? Should college education be free for all students?
Some people believe that all guns should be banned, or at least registered, except for military, police, and perhaps sporting use.Some people believe that all guns should be permitted, and none registered.Many take positions between those extremes.one view opposed to banningNo. When guns are banned, the only people with guns are criminals. If you want to cut down on crime, make it easier for everyone to carry concealed. It will cut back on court costs and eliminate the costs to house criminals in prison.
The US should not ban hand guns. A tool is a tool. The user is the problem.
I'm pretty sure that different airports banned guns at different times.
No
The act of attempting to restrict the access to guns is unconstitutional so it therefor should be banned.
you have to hack it to get gold guns
No
If you take the example of the UK (where guns are banned), the normal police on duty on the streets are not armed with guns. There are UK police trained to use and carry guns but they only do so when responding to a situation where a criminal is seen to be armed. Based on this tried example, is is clear that if guns were banned effectively, the police would not need to carry weapons.