"Congress shall make no law ... prohibiting ... or abridging..."
Those are the limitations put in place by the First Amendment, and they are not meant to limit the citizens - they are meant to limit the government in its never-ending quest for growth and control.
Chat with our AI personalities
No, the first amendment should never be limited since it would limit the beliefs of Amernican citizens. If it was limited in any way American citizens would not be able to declare any other rights that the should have.
No. The 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution makes that not possible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution banned the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol.*It was ratified on January 16, 1919 and repealed by the 21st Amendment in 1933. In the over 200 years of the U.S. Constitution, the 18th Amendment remains the only Amendment to ever have been repealed.
You are probably referring to the 21st Amendment, which ended Prohibition. The 18th amendment to the Constitution (1919) made it illegal to manufacture, sell or distribute alcoholic beverages. It was supposed to reduce alcoholism and lower crime rates (many crimes were related to drunkenness), but it turned out to be a very unpopular law, as well as a law that was nearly impossible to enforce. By 1933, the 21st Amendment had repealed it.
The first, which is why the Sedition Acts of 1798 caused so much uproar. They were the only laws in US History to ever blatantly infringe on that right.
where did the first ever evacuees come from where did the first ever evacuees come from