0
Still curious? Ask our experts.
Chat with our AI personalities
Fran
Ezra
JordanAdd your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In what ways did popular sovereignty stir up sectional tensions in the 1850s?
n what ways did popular sovereignty stir up sectional tensions in the 1850s?
Do interest groups perform positive functions for government officials?
Interest groups do not perform positive functions for government officials because they stir thoughts and encourages people to battle against what the government officials want to do.
What is a Victorian soap boiler?
A cauldron heated by wood to render beef fat then add the alkali and water mix plus the salt and stir till solids form,
What was Thomas Paines quote?
= Quotations by Author = Thomas Paine (1737 - 1809)US patriot & political philosopher [more author details]Showing quotations 1 to 13 of 13 total - We have 1 book review related to Thomas Paine.; Better fare hard with good men than feast it with bad. : Thomas Paine ; He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. : Thomas Paine ; Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness. : Thomas Paine ; Such is the irresistible nature of truth that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing. : Thomas Paine ; The real man smiles in trouble, gathers strength from distress, and grows brave by reflection. : Thomas Paine ; The world is my country, all mankind are my brethren, and to do good is my religion. : Thomas Paine- More quotations on: [Mankind] ; To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. : Thomas Paine ; What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly. : Thomas Paine ; When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary. : Thomas Paine- More quotations on: [Planning] ; A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice. : Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792 ; When my country, into which I had just set my foot, was set on fire about my ears, it was time to stir. It was time for every man to stir. : Thomas Paine, Common Sense - 22 Quotations in other collection Here is the link I found the information at http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Thomas_Paine/
What case was a precedent for Texas v Johnson?
It depends on how the question is read.If it is asking for what the precedent that Texas v. Johnson set, the answer is: It set the precedent that flag-burning is a legal form of protest in the United States, regardless of how offensive it may be to individual Americans and how venerated the symbol is.If it is asking for what cases served as precedents for the justices making the decision of Texas v. Johsnon, the answer is: There are several cases that serve as precedents upon which the decision in Texas v. Johnson relies. Below are a smattering of cases cited by the Brennan-written majority.West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 (1943) is a case where a school board ejected kids who refused to speak the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The majority found that recognizing that the right to differ is the centerpiece of our First Amendment freedoms. Not everyone needs to speak the Pledge of Allegiance, even if it considered appropriate.Spence v. Washington, 418 U. S. 405 (1974) which showed that a physical act can come within the ambit of the term "speech" in the First Amendment as long as it is clearly expressive.Schacht v. United States, 398 U. S. 58 (1970) which permitted the disgracing of military uniforms in a protest over the Vietnam War. This was held regardless of how special and important the US military is.Smith v. Goguen, 415 U. S. 566 (1974) which permitted the creation and wearing of a pair of pants with a US flag sewn into the crotch-region. Contemptuous treatment of the flag does not prevent it from having expressive value and being protected as free speech.Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U. S. 444 (1969) which holds that discriminatory (Klu Klux Klan) advocacy is permitted as long as it does not stir immediate violence or a "breach of the peace". This is relevant because speech is prohibited if it causes immediate violence. If flag-burning were that type of advocacy, then the result might be different.
