Madison justified the new central government envisioned in the Constitution by stating that the separation of government into three powers would check the powers. He believed that if the government abused it's powers, the citizens had the right to revolt and overturn the government.
no one ....only constitution
Yes - because it declared slavery to be legal in every state of the Union. That was the essence of the Lincoln-Douglas debates of 1858.
No the Congress can not nullify a ruling of the Supreme Court. The Congress would have to rewrite the law which the Supreme Court had declared unconstitutional. Then the new law could overrule the Supreme Court IF the new law was declared constitutional if/when appealed.
The executive branch of government has the power to veto bills proposed by the legislative branch. The executive branch of government has the power to overturn laws and rulings made within the judicial branch of government as well!
It would depend on which country you are referring to.
Madison justified the new central government envisioned in the Constitution by stating that the separation of government into three powers would check the powers. He believed that if the government abused it's powers, the citizens had the right to revolt and overturn the government.
no one ....only constitution
Assuming that you are talking about a Government, it's to 'overthrow' a Government.
Fulgencio Batista's
yes
overturn an act of congress that violates the constitution - apex
No branch does this.The Judicial branch ... specifically the Supreme Court ... can rule on whether laws are compatible with the US Constitution or not, and overturn laws which are not (the US Constitution is "above the law" in that all laws passed by the Legislative branch and ratified by the Executive branch are strictly subordinate to it, and in any conflict between the two, the Constitution takes precedence), but this is only peripherally related to "fairness".
The Supreme Court is the head of the judicial branch of the government and has the responsibility to enforce the Constitution. If legislation is found to be unconstitutional then it is overturned.
They can overturn the veto with a two-thirds majority vote.
The Supreme Courts job is to interpret and uphold the laws of today based on their knowledge of the constitution. They would not be able to decide anything directly violating the constitution, but they do have their own interpretation of what it says. Knowing this, it is possibly that the amendments could overturn their decision, although it is extremely unlikely that it would.
Yes, you either need Congress to change the law(and if their law was declared unconstitutional they need to change the original law to make it constitutional.) And if Congress doesn't want to change the law they need to propose an amendment addition to the Constitution. The Supreme Court can overturn its own decisions. For example, Plessy vs Ferguson was overturned by Brown vs The Board of Education.