Traditional democracies die when the people discover that they can vote to give themselves "bread and circuses".
When the populace decide to vote that the government give them money, the civilization is doomed. "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson
There is no risk
That the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights in order to protect individual liberties, and that the States' power was at risk of being lost to overwhelming power of the Federal Government.
The political risk refers to the instability of the political system in a country.
Both the Federal Employee Loyalty Program, as well as Joseph McCarthy's hearings, were focused on rooting out communist influence in the US government. McCarthy's hearings sometimes also focused on evaluating the security risk of homosexuals in government.
T&M Time and Material (T&M ) contracts are used for acquiring supplies or services on the basis of direct labor hours at specified fixed hourly rates that include wages, overhead, general and administrative expenses, and profit; and materials at cost. They may be used only when it is not possible at the time of placing the contract to estimate accurately the ex tent or duration of the work or to anticipate costs with any reasonable degree of confidence. Because it places the most risk on the Government, T&M is the least preferred contract type.
The differences between traditional risk management and enterprise risk management are their strategic applications and performance metrics. Enterprise risk management involves the whole organization while traditional risk management is usually more departmentalized.
Traditional life insurance gives less return but ULIP may gives high return. Traditional life insurance has no risk factor and ULIP has risk factor.
The role of the government in international political risk is to provide the framework that will allow people take non-business risk in a given country.
The risk of a government bond is minimal, though the return from the government bond is very low compared to other lucrative bonds available in the market.When you opt for more return, there is more risk. Whereas though in government bond, the return is low, your investment is well secured and risk ratio is almost nil.
They are considered credit "risk free" because the government can always print money to repay bond holders. It doesn't mean thay will! The reality is that there is a degree of credit risk, although generally small, but the government bonds do exhibit other risks (such as interest rate risk).
'Risk-free' US government bond shave virtually no risk of default, but they are exposed to interest rate risk - the chance that interest rates will rise, causing bond prices to fall and investors to experience either a real or an 'opportunity' loss
Albert Weale has written: 'A tale of two strategies' 'Risk, Democratic Citizenship and Public Policy' 'Democratic Citizenship and the European Union (Europe in Change)' 'Democracy' -- subject(s): Democracy, Political science 'The new politics of pollution' -- subject(s): Economic aspects, Economic aspects of Pollution, Environmental policy, Government policy, Pollution
Without knowing the specifics it is impossible to say. This question, though, can very often make people ill at ease. Say that you are in a class situation, and some aspect of the class was understood when people were registering. If the prof wants to make a change, even one that might seem benign to most, he runs the risk of really inconveniencing offending or angering one or more in the class. It seems unreasonable that a individual who came in with a stated expectation should have to later "defend" the expectation, and run the risk of appearing uncooperative to the rest of the group. The prof, or anyone else in this situation, should at the very least give everyone the opportunity to make a completely private objection, and be willing to drop the proposal even if one person objects (perhaps depending on the nature of the proposal.)
The government had responded by rescuing the people more likely at risk from the floods.
Yes. There is a risk to the cultures here, a risk to jobs and the economy, risks to our democratic systems, risks to our social programs and a physical risk to those living with people from places where violence is normal or accepted.
they are acellular and do not pose a risk for causing the disease
Risk free rate of return or risk free return is calculated as the return on government securities of the same maturity.