0
This was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were "separate but equal."?
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896)
The Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896) was a landmark case that upheld a Louisiana statute allowing for "equal but separate" facilities. The facilities in question were railway cars which were divided by partition and offered the same accommodations to white and "colored" races. It was found that these provisions were not in conflict with the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
What else can I help you with?
What was the impact the Dred Scott decision on the political crisis?
Caused serious confusion about the legality of slavery. Taken literally, it meant that there was no such thing as free soil. This delighted the South. But the Abolitionists were greatly offended, and the highly public Lincoln-Douglas debates thrashed out the arguments at length.
Rule of reason?
Is a standard courts use in testing the legality of business conduct under section 1 of the http://www.answers.com/topic/sherman-antitrust-act Antitrust Act.
Who : The Declaration of Independence can be divided into 3 parts including:a proclamation about man's rights and the legality of the revolutiona formal declaration of independence?
a record of complaints against King George III
What fulfill the bases of the strict scrutiny test?
The guidelines used by the court to determine the legality of all but sex-based discrimination. Discrimination is legal if it is a necessary means by which the government can achieve a compelling public interest.
How are the questions left unresolved at the Philadelphia convention addressed in the fourteenth amendment?
The Fourteenth Amendment establish equal rights and protection to all United States citizens. It covered citizenship, protection, legality, and equality that hadn't been an issue at the Constitutional Convention.
What were the reasons behind the decision on the Plessy V Ferguson case decision?
The main reason behind the decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case was the upheld legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Supreme Court ruled that as long as facilities and opportunities provided to African Americans were theoretically equal to those provided to whites, segregation was constitutional. This decision had significant implications for promoting racial discrimination and the perpetuation of Jim Crow laws in the United States.
What did the supreme court decide in Korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
When is the legality of an action clear?
The legality of an action is clear when it is explicitly defined and governed by established laws, regulations, or legal precedents. Additionally, when there is a consensus among legal authorities and interpretations that support the action's permissibility, its legality becomes evident. In cases where laws are ambiguous or conflicting, the legality may be less clear and may require judicial interpretation.
What did the supreme court decide in case korematsu v. US?
The decision upheld the legality of the wartime internment policy
What was the supreme courts decision in plessy v. Ferguson?
The Supreme Court decided "separate but equal" (i.e.,segregation) was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as long as the facilities or accommodations were equal.More InformationIn Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a Louisiana law, The Separate Car Act of 1890 (Act 111), requiring African-Americans and Caucasians to travel in separate railroad cars was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, as long as the accommodations provided for the African-Americans were equal to those provided for Whites.This validated the "separate but equal" doctrine whites used to avoid accepting African-Americans as peers, and allowed the proliferation of Jim Crow laws throughout the South. The decision validated segregation as legal.The ruling appeared to contradict a recent decision prohibiting segregation on trains traveling across state lines. In the earlier case, the Court invoked Congress' authority to regulate commerce between the states under the Constitution's Interstate Commerce Clause, not the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. In Plessy, the Court upheld the Louisiana state courts' ruling by a vote of 7-1 (Justice Brewer took no part in the case; Justice John Marshall Harlan dissented).The precedent in Plessy v. Ferguson held until explicitly overturned by the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education, (1954)Case Citation:Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)it legalized the public segregation of blacks and whites
When was Legality Movement created?
Legality Movement was created in 1941.
If south was for slavery why were they fighting for states rights?
It is likely that they wished for each state to make the decision on the legality of slavery. That would be the proper 'state's rights' position for the period.
What is a short sentence for the word legality?
I intend to challenge the legality of his claim in the courts.
When was Legality Movement Party created?
Legality Movement Party was created in 1924.
What are the illegal attempts vs legality of Hitler 1933?
illegal vs. legality
Why was Supreme Court justice Marshall's decision so important to the future of American politics?
US Supreme Justice John Marshall gave the majority decision in the Marbury v. Madison case. It was important because it established the legality of the procedure called judicial review. This allowed the Court to make proactive decisions on whether laws were constitutional or not. Previously the Court would be reactive, meaning it would decide cases brought to the court regarding constitutional matters.
Why was the south pleased with the dred Scott decision?
The South was pleased with the Dred Scott decision because it strengthened the rights of slaveowners by ruling that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and were therefore not entitled to the rights and protections of the Constitution. This decision also reaffirmed the legality of slavery in the territories, which was a key issue that the South was concerned about.
