answersLogoWhite

0


Verified answer

adjudication

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
User Avatar

Tamika Watson

Lvl 1
2y ago
Adjud
User Avatar

Katie Breedlove

Lvl 1
1y ago
J
More answers
User Avatar

Mabelle McDermott

Lvl 10
2y ago

Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Torey Greenfelder

Lvl 10
2y ago

Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Berta Yundt

Lvl 13
2y ago

Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

To give power, right or authority

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Dawensky Paul

Lvl 3
2y ago

Right

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Do know the answrr

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

Adjudication

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
4y ago

Adjudication

This answer is:
User Avatar
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about American Government

Who give power or right or authority?

to give power right or authority


States that have adopted an executive budget give their governors which two vital powers?

Power to prepare and carry out the state budget and authority to administer the funds to all state departments a+


What is called the principle that the Constitution founders divided powers between the central government and regional units?

It is called devolution. It is based on the need to give regional units the power to make legislation that is relevant it.


Which powers give a state the authority to create local government units including a public school system?

Reserved Powers give a state the authority to create local governmental units including a public school system.


What is judicial immunity?

To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt>

Related questions

In us civics what does it mean to give power right or authority?

in u.s civics: to give power, right or authority is called?


Who give power or right or authority?

to give power right or authority


What does it mean to give power or authority?

to give power right or authority


What gives power right to authority?

Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.


Who is the committee chairman?

to give power right or authority


To give power right or authority is what?

Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.


The starting substances that are evolved in a chemical reaction?

To give power, right or authority?


Did God give power and authority to the Virgin Mary?

No, God gave no specific power or authority to Mary.


Difference between power and authority?

answer is authority many be define as a ability to control order and enforce obedience. authority therefor give one the to command order to obey as their duty.


What is the difference between authority and constituted authority?

Authority refers to the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience. Constituted authority specifically refers to authority that is established through a legal or formal process, such as through a constitution or government structure. Constituted authority is more formally recognized and typically has a specific scope and limits to its power.


Write short notes of Authority and power?

In management, authority is the right or power assigned to an executive or manager in order to achieve certain organizational objectives. Authority is essential in the job of the management. It indicates the right and power of making decisions, giving order and instruction to suborddinates. Those must be accepted by the subordinates or middle level managers as it is ddelegated by top managers. So, because of this it flows downwards. It is also known as the right to give orders and the power to extract obedience.


Importance of authority in the public services?

Authority is somebody who takes over control over other people or a group, by power and respect. Authority is all about the power through position. Like a lieutenant or a corporal. They are given these instructions or these commands so that they obey the government legislation for the police force, army etc. Authority is mostly all about the power to give the right orders and make the right decisions that may help others. It is also there to help enforce obedience, this may mean that you have a lot of authority over attendants. Authority is about the right to act, and you are given a delegated from one person to another.