0
Verified answer
adjudication
Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.
Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.
Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.
The act of giving power, right, or authority to someone is called delegation. Delegation involves entrusting a specific task or responsibility to another individual, typically a subordinate or team member, while still retaining overall accountability for the outcome. Effective delegation can help distribute workload, empower team members, and improve overall productivity and efficiency within an organization.
Right
Who give power or right or authority?
to give power right or authority
States that have adopted an executive budget give their governors which two vital powers?
Power to prepare and carry out the state budget and authority to administer the funds to all state departments a+
What is called the principle that the Constitution founders divided powers between the central government and regional units?
It is called devolution. It is based on the need to give regional units the power to make legislation that is relevant it.
Which powers give a state the authority to create local government units including a public school system?
Reserved Powers give a state the authority to create local governmental units including a public school system.
What is judicial immunity?
To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt> To understand this concept, one must go back to the founding of this nation. We threw off a king and English rule as we were being taxed and not being represented in govt, among other things. We did not accept sovereign or parliament authority in which we had no part. Because of this, the founders to form a representative govt with its authority and limitations set by the people. Remember the people had to approve the Constitution that set that authority and limits. The states and colonists had just fought a war to throw governmental authority and they werent about to give this govt any sovereignty over the will of the people. We gave the President the authority to pardon etc. We gave Congress the power to make law etc. We gave judges the authority to carry out our laws and the Constitutuon as it was written. However, we never gave courts, public officials, judges, congressmen, and all their staffs immunity from our laws and Constitution. Immunity is nowhere to be found in our Constitution as the people did not give it, and in fact did not want anyone to be above t he laws and principals under which it was formed. As the people are the supreme authority in a democracy or republic. Thus as stated in the "Federalist" it is the people that are sovereign not govt. Those people are the only ones that can grant immunity, the power to pardon, or anything else. AND THE PEOPLE NEVER GAVE JUDGES OR ANYONE ELSE IMMUNITY FROM OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION. Nor did we give Congress or anyone else the authority to grant immunity to anyone! We didnt give it to prosecutors, courts, judges, congress, etc. And we surely werent bound by any English or foreign laws. Thus immunity claimed by courts and judges has no basis in our country and in fact, doesnt exist. Therefore, Judicial Immunity is a court made immunity and the court has never had authority to make or create it. Judicial Immunity is a sham that has no basis in our law or country. It simply doesnt exist! The people alone can grant immunity not the govt, courts, judges or any instrument of govt>
In us civics what does it mean to give power right or authority?
in u.s civics: to give power, right or authority is called?
Who give power or right or authority?
to give power right or authority
What does it mean to give power or authority?
to give power right or authority
What gives power right to authority?
Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.
Who is the committee chairman?
to give power right or authority
To give power right or authority is what?
Adjudication means to give power, right, or authority.
Did God give power and authority to the Virgin Mary?
No, God gave no specific power or authority to Mary.
Difference between power and authority?
answer is authority many be define as a ability to control order and enforce obedience. authority therefor give one the to command order to obey as their duty.
What is the difference between authority and constituted authority?
Authority refers to the power or right to give orders, make decisions, and enforce obedience. It can be derived from various sources such as expertise, position, or law. Constituted authority specifically refers to authority that is established or created by a constitution or legal framework. This type of authority is formally recognized and granted by a governing body, ensuring legitimacy and adherence to established rules and regulations.
What is the differene between power and authority?
Power is the ability to influence others and control resources, while authority is the right to make decisions and give commands that are legally or socially recognized. Power can be gained through personal characteristics or relationships, whereas authority is often granted through a formal position or role.
What are the differences between authority and constituted authority?
differnce between constitued authority and authority
Write short notes of Authority and power?
In management, authority is the right or power assigned to an executive or manager in order to achieve certain organizational objectives. Authority is essential in the job of the management. It indicates the right and power of making decisions, giving order and instruction to suborddinates. Those must be accepted by the subordinates or middle level managers as it is ddelegated by top managers. So, because of this it flows downwards. It is also known as the right to give orders and the power to extract obedience.
