False
false they insisted on entering it as a free state
false
yes, it is false.
true
1.) in preemptive scheduling we prempt the currently executing process, in non preemptive scheduling we allow the current process to finish its CPU burst time... 2.) in preemptive scheduling the process is forcibly sent to waiting state when a process with higher priority comes to CPU, in non preeemptive scheduling the process at running state can not be forced to leave the CPU until it completes........
The false statement is that the state's new constitution gave only limited power to the state's governor.
False
False
It depends of whether the current process will give up CPU to a task in the waiting state that will execute faster than itself. In this case it would be preemptive, else it would not be.
false
false they insisted on entering it as a free state
Once the CPU has been allocated to a process, the process keeps the CPU until it releases the CPU either by terminating or by switching to the waiting state. In a general purpose computer system, users share the CPU and care about system responsiveness. If the system uses non-preemptive scheduling, some users may sit before the monitor for several hours without doing anything other than waiting for the set of processes in front of them in the system queue to finish. So, strictly non-preemptive scheduling is unlikely to be used in a general purpose computer system.
False
True: government is the supreme power within the state.
True.
False. In a Confederation, more power belongs to the individual, or state, governments.